All posts by StorminNorman

Fallen Norman descended WASP with a dash or two of other Hanjal Periphery ethnies in my bloodline. I seek to conquer the Saracen, Mongoloid and mystery meat hordes not through direct combat as that would land me in jail but rather through cavorting with their women and in turn Cucking their men on a metaphysical and also physical level. FYI the Dindu is my spirit animal😉

The Return of The Mannerbund

The Alt Right has a problem. This problem if not dealt with could make or break the future of the movement. The problem I speak of is not subversives entering the movement or (((merchants))) constantly projecting their own fantasies on us via mainstream news. The problem I speak of is a lack of unity and a lack of charisma. Sure the autistes in the movement are great at shit posting on twitter and making dank memes. They even manage to carry out some high profile publicity stunts like the Chalkining and most likely are a guiding influence among the Trump campaign. There may even be some Alt Righters among Trumps advisors. So what is wrong with autistes you ask?
.
The problem I speak of is a problem of charisma or better yet a problem of drive. To understand what I mean I would like to reference a scene in Braveheart when Longshanks states “the problem with Scotland is its full of Scots.” Yes this is our problem we are full of autistes who would rather sit at home on a Friday night than go to a bar throw back a few drinks and find a girl. So I am going to take a lesson from Islam and our own European tribal past and suggest we organize “Mannerbund” groups for the sole purpose of carousing, going out to bars and meeting women. More importantly just as Longshanks stated in Braveheart “This should fetch just the sort of lords I need.” Such a strategy could fetch just the sort of men the Alt Right needs to succeed beyond the Animae watching “neets” the media portrays us as.
.
“Every Other Tribe Seeks to Fuck Your Women Its Time You Return the Favor”
.
If you go to a club, bar or even a large social event like the St. Patrick’s Day parade I attended this year in Boston, you are going to notice a pattern. When you do see a mixed race or mixed ethnic couple under 30, it is more often than not going to be a White woman with a nonwhite man. Of the roughly 2 dozen inter racial couples I walked by on the way to the bar, all were White female with nonwhite male with the exception of one white SWPL male dating an Indian girl of the dot variety. More importantly I saw an equal amount of Asian male White female couples, compared to the usual Black male White female couples. Of course there were all sorts of Middle Eastern, Mestizo and Dominican Mulatto type males with pretty blondes on their arms, or should I say with hand on ass. The traditional standby of White Male Asian Female was all but absent, as was any White guy dating anything but the typical entitled and often fat White girl. So what the hell is going on?
.
In a recent article for Taki’s Magazine Love Is Still Not Colorblind, Steve Sailer followed up on a 1997 article in which he tried to explain the disparities among interracial couples. Back in 1997 Black husband White wife couples were 2.5 times more common than the reverse and White husband Asian wife couples were 2.5 time more common than the reverse. However Sailer reported a new statistical trend today. While the trend for Black male White female couples held steady, the Asian ratio had almost reached parity. Yes those Beta male Asians are getting White girls. So why is this? Sailer argues that it’s because American culture is Masculinizing and makes for more attractive men and less attractive women. I think the truth is far more repugnant.
.
My theory is drawn from biological reality and historical fact. When one tribe of men invade a new territory they subdue the men and have their way with the women. More often than not they killed the men and male children and used the females for recreational purposes. Did Odysseus not throw Hectors son from the walls of Troy? Was the Trojan priestess Cassandra not raped by Greeks? In the process they create a mixed breed underclass along with a more ethnically intact upper class which lorded over the half castes. This was true for the Mongol hordes, Ottoman Turks, Arabs, Moors, the Bantu tribes of Africa, the Siberian Cossacks, Amerindian tribes and more recently Spanish Conquistadors. Though the Conquistadors seemed to have mixed less out of a rape and pillage attitude than due to a lack of Spanish women in the Americas. This tendency also exists in social animals, male Chimps and Lions even do it!
.
And yes White man now it’s your turn. All the disparate tribes invade your countries and the men of these more vigorous tribes are fucking your women. However should you approach a woman from one of these tribes when she is in the company of her own you will be rebuked or even physically attacked as I have. This is also true of those model minority Asian males. Go to any area with a significant Asian presence. You will notice while an Asian woman is near Asian men they will do anything and everything to prevent her from talking to a round eye. I have even seen them start fights over females who are complete strangers to them. In cities like Boston with a large and growing Asian presence this animosity among Asian males toward White males in the sexual marketplace is growing ever stronger. It’s gotten to the point where if I’m in a club that’s more than 20% Asian I leave.
.
However the reverse is not true. It’ been almost a decade since I joined the 21 and over night life scene and I have yet to see a group of White men reprimand a Non White male for approaching or being with a White Woman. But I have seen Dindus, Mystery meat Hispanics, all types of Kebabs, South Asians from the Sub Continent and especially East Asians do it. Of course all the while they are chasing the fairest of white women. To them fucking a blonde or red head is a badge of honor among the males of their community.
.
So how do we counteract this without getting arrested for a micro aggressive hate crime? Simple we beat them at their own game. We form a Mannerbund of base White Males for the sole purpose of reasserting our status with our own women and plundering the women of other non-European descended groups. Now this is not an open invitation to miscegenation. Remember you are White men and you should have the agency to wear protection or at least pull out.
.
I speak from personal experience having partaken in the charms of females from various ethnic groups and origins. That’s how I ended up in the Alt Right in the first place. The more women you bed from a non-European background or even different European backgrounds, the more you will realize we are not all the same and that women the world over from less altruistic societies really do worship the strong jawed white male even if our own women do not. Go forth my brothers and reassert your dominance over these orcs and uppity invaders. Just make sure you do it in a Mannerbund, as their is strength in numbers and in unity. In a world where White Male retaliation against invading hoards assaulting our women is verboten, it would be best to beat the invaders at their own game lest you be swept aside for Jamal, Akmed or even Chang and your genes extinguished.
branigans law

The Importance of Art

Trying to convince normal people of the realities of the world is like herding cats. They will not listen to you and they will most likely run from you the harder you try to present your case. They are so indoctrinated by the modern culture of double standards and anti-white ideology that they can’t see the forest through the trees. They will constantly cherry pick examples from the nightly news or their individual lives in order to desperately hold on to their world view. So how are you supposed to make people aware of what’s right in front of their eyes? The answer can be found in art. As the following experiences have taught me.
.
Statistics and meta-analysis mean nothing to the average person. They do not understand even the most basic of such concepts. Rather they rely on their emotions and sense of morality to decide what to believe. When you point out the news only shows stories that fit the narrative of the “evil” white male oppressing everyone, they will simply call you a racist or crazy. This is particularly so of women. Your average woman only seeks to maintain the “status quo” or culture of the current year. From an evolutionary standpoint this was always the safest thing for them to do. In my experience even the most politically correct attempts to point out the obvious will lead to a cascading series of accusations. “You’re saying that ethnic groups have different averages for IQ so you must think all blacks are retarded! I bet you wouldn’t say that to a black persons face! I can’t stand a person who thinks like you, get away from me!” Forget the fact these people don’t understand the concept of a bell curve, a standard deviation, regression to the mean or even that half of people are above and below average.
.
Funny enough the earlier example was from a mixed race girl who was very easy to convince of the JQ “Jewish Question” and the Jewish tendency to undermine their host nation and host population. She also took to the fact that North East Asians have a higher IQ than most groups easily, as she works for a few. The second a fact might reflect badly on her potential status in a racially aware population, she could not handle it. However she was instinctively far more of a race realist in mate preference, where she choose to live or the types of TV she watched than she will ever realize. More importantly she was far more of a race realist than the vast majority of White American girls.
.
I’ve never actually never been called a racist by a female who does not fit the Nordic ideal. The only women who have ever called me racist are those of the Northern European variety. In these instances I never even attempted to red pill them but rather would simply point out the obvious. “It’s so hard being a woman in this city” one girl complained. “Every day I walk by this church and the men on the stairs yell the most vile things at me and sometimes even try to touch me” a 23 year old girl from lily white New Hampshire once told me. I simply asked her “What kind of men where they? Where they men like me?” After a few more probing questions she realized I was asking what race where the men. To which she replied with an inner horror and accused me of being a “white supremacist.”
.
Another leggy, blonde bombshell college student was once telling me of her travels in Europe. As I had not been there during the current migrant crisis, I asked her opinion on it. She replied with your typical SWPL “We need to help these poor people.” When I asked her about the sex ratio of the migrants or their ages she seemed baffled. “What do you mean she asked” and of course I pointed out that these people were not women and children but close to 90% military aged men who once in Europe began robbing and raping with no response from the cucked cops. She of course called me a racists and said people should be able to “move wherever they want.” That was the end of the conversation.
.
However I have had successes. These victories came not from logical debate but rather through art. I have always had a flair for culture, museums and of course good movies. Most men can make use of these in the dating battlefield. If you wish to demonstrate the obvious, finding the rare movie which portrays the world in a realistic light will do more to convince a woman then any book. Some favorites of mine are the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, The Last of the Mohicans, Apocalypto and any other Mel Gibson movie for the most part. Gran Torino is another one as it simply points out that all too often it’s a white man who willingly sacrifices himself to save another race, while forsaking his own. But of course the majority of movies will spin a very different narrative and are best avoided. Most powerful of all however is a trip to a museum, a national park or some grandiose achievement or Western peoples. Great Works of classical art are awe inspiring to women. They are a tool to raise awareness of the ethnicity of the peoples who created them. Often you will find “art” from more primitive tropical areas of the world next to the work of a Dutch Master or Renaissance Sculpture. Seeing such a comparison can undue years of conditioning by the politically correct establishment.
ChargeofthelightBrigade

Why I No Longer Read ROK and Neither Should You

If you are reading this chances are you either came to this website through Return of Kings or are at least familiar with it. While I was an avid ROK reader in the past, I have mixed feelings about the influence Return of Kings has had on me and as such I have made a concerted effort to avoid venturing anywhere near its URL. My reasons being two fold. First one has to wade through a lot of bad advice and opinion to get to anything worthwhile or useful. Secondly, Roosh and many in the ROK community vehemently ignore objective science and hard data, unless it supports their rape and pillage attitude toward the current state of the west.

Keep in mind a large number of those on ROK are nothing more than thirsty Dravidians, Mongoloids and mystery meat brown men lusting after white women. As such so much of the articles are geared toward advertising the merits of nonwhite women to white men and also teaching nonwhite men how to score with white women. I myself fell upon many dusky skinned temptresses at the advice of Roosh. I also threw away one of the few if only “pristine” white American women I had due to the retarded PUA mentality Roosh advises. Strangely he himself steers clear of all women now but the fair skinned Slavic and Nordic variety. As a once long time defender of ROK I now believe it should change its name to Roost of Kebabs.

Furthermore after meeting many in the ROK community I have come to realize many of these men should NOT be giving advice on women. Though there are obviously men within the fold of ROK that do very well with the ladies, a large segment seem to me to be nothing more than avid readers and writers of fiction, in a Penthouse forum sort of way. However as with all things even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally. As such I will admit that ROK did wake me up to the overwhelming subversive nature of Jewish intellectual and political movements on Western Civilization. I already had an understanding of their influence on second and third wave feminism, though not so much as to why they shoved it down the Goyim’s throat.

But for those of you who have a strong attachment to ROK, if you have found yourself here than the website has most likely given you all it can. Once I woke up to the reality of hypergamy, white knitting, oneittis, the Dark Triad and the degenerate influence modern western culture is having on women, I had learned all I could from ROK. If you already realize that women (with a few exceptions), lack agency and are simply slaves to their primitive emotions and herd mentality, you might be better off investigating the reasons for their enablement. The reallocation of decision making powers in Western Civilization from men to women has been a disaster and allowed to occur at the direct detriment of a healthy society. This was no accidental but rather pushed for by moneyed interests in order to achieve an easily influence mass of pliable voters, who would make decisions not on logic but emotion. For those of you looking for a more realistic view of feminism and the male female dynamic in today’s society, Chateau Heartiste would be a good place to start.

As for Return of Kings most of what pops up on there is the same thing repackaged in a different way to appeal to young horny men who are dissatisfied with their mundane job and lack of pleasant or attractive women. Roosh knows this and he is using the website to pay his bills. He is a merchant of sorts and using ROK to line his pockets to allow for his international playboy lifestyle. In short should you pay any attention to ROK or Roosh’s blog you are a cuck and enjoy subsidizing another man so he can fuck your women. Death to cuckolds! You don’t deserve to reproduce and if I could choke you through the internet I would.

Game Simplified

Simplify, simplify, simplify.
-Henry David Thoreau

.

Everyone reading this must be aware of a concept called Game. If you are not familiar with the term than either you are a natural or you are a recluse who needs to get out more. For most of you the term Game should be self-evident and may conjure up various images of a smooth talking man at a cocktail bar chatting up some doe eyed vixen, while she hangs on his every word. For those of you who grew up in a culture inundated with hip hop, Game might evoke an image of some brash urban lyricist hollering that bitches ain’t shit but hoes and tricks. This was my first introduction to Game and I will always equate not giving a fuck with Game. In order to have good Game one must know what Game is and the easiest way to understand something is to simplify it into its most basic components. As such the following piece in essence will be an attempt to simplify Game.
.
What is Game in reality? There is so much questionable information in the Man-o-sphere and Return of Kings especially, that one can often become lost as to what Game is and how you can practice “good Game.” In many ways listening to others discuss their version of Game ruined my own game. I believe there are several reasons for this. First off, if you become self-conscious of your own actions you often hesitate, and hesitation comes off as nervousness to a woman. This is a huge turn off to her evolutionary instinct to seek out a capable man. Furthermore, after meeting several members of the ROK community, I feel at least 50% embellish their personal experiences. As the old saying goes don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story. For a select few, I feel most of what they claim is in reality complete bullshit, and no one should follow their advice as it does not work but just sounds appealing to aspiring PUAs.
.
I also sense a good portion of the advice given on ROK is dependent on the practitioner. As my father use to say “It’s not the arrow that kills you, it’s the Indian.” This observation also applies to what I have seen of game played out in the real world. You could lack any game whatsoever but if you look like a young Brad Pitt you are going to get attention from the ladies no matter what. On the flip side if you are obese game will not help you though celebrity might.
.
I have seen different gradients of game work for different individuals, under different circumstances. For example if you are a fairly muscle bound individual and look like a gym rat, nice guy game often will get you father than you think. Conversely being aggressive and cocky will work more in your favor if you look non-threatening. So for men that weight 140 pounds or aren’t over 6 foot 4 you might have more success with this strategy. For taller men or simply men who look musclebound you can get away with more of a nice guy approach, as women are less likely to question your dominance. So in this respect much of game could be summed up as different strokes for different folks. However I am attempting to simplify game not make it more complex and to do this I will break it down to its most basic biological components. These components being reproductive strategy and life history strategy.
.
As the various populations of this world evolved to fit different ecological niches they developed different strategies towards reproduction. For populations evolved under the harshest conditions of the last ice age, high paternal investment, pair bonding, altruism and a reserved, inhibited personality was selected for. For populations from warmer climates lower paternal investment, lower pair bonding, lower altruism and more aggressive, uninhibited personalities were selected for.
In the ROK community and various politically incorrect segments of the Manosphere, there is the tendency to classify black men as natural Alphas and conversely Europeans and Northern Asians as being more beta. If we hold the Alpha beta Omega spectrum to be fact than, there is a lot of truth to this statement. But if this is true it must be explained from an evolutionary biology standpoint.
.
In northern regions of the world, especially during the last ice age, food was scarce and the climate harsh. The only food available for most of the year would have been large game like Mammoths, Mastodons, Aurochs and other large extinct mammals. As women were not physically suited to kill such animals with stone weapons, this task fell to men. As such if men of these regions did not stick around after impregnating their women to help feed, clothe and protect their pregnant female partners and offspring, their children would have died and their genes would have died with them. As such there was evolutionary selection for men who empathized and bonded with their women and children. Layman would call this love or in the case of the Manosphere oneitis.
.
Additionally men from Northern climates would have evolved to cooperate and work together with their male peers as it was the only way to hunt such large animals. As such trying to impregnate your fellow tribe member’s woman or constantly fighting with him over women, would not have been a good strategy for the long term survival of your tribe in such a cold climate. Northern forest and arctic tribes have mostly lived by the standard of one man one woman as it allows for cooperation and the manpower needed to both hunt and fight the elements.
.
Conversely men from warmer and especially tropical areas of the world did not need to hang around or invest much in their offspring as the women of these climates could simply gather plant based food or scavenge meat. As such, it was far more advantageous for men from these climates not to pair bond with one partner but instead compete with other men and try and impregnate as many women, as possible as their children stood a good chance of surviving without them around. It should also be noted that tropical diseases led to a high infant and child mortality rate and this would have led toward a tendency toward a higher birth rate to compensate. Populations in between the tropics and colder north would have evolved in between the two extremes. This is especially so in warmer agricultural areas where male investment was higher than in the tropics due to farm work. However the longer growing seasons and more abundant food allowed for polygamy and in turn religions like Islam developed.
.
As many of you reading this probably know, the late great Phillipe Rushton tried to simplify race and ethnic differences in personality, cognition and physical characteristics into a biological spectrum termed R vs K life history strategy. This R vs K spectrum was originally developed by E.O. Wilson to explain the differences in life span, maturation, and paternal investment among organisms. More complex organisms tend to evolve smaller litter sizes, longer childhoods and more paternal investment under conditions where resources are scarce and more care would be required to ensure that each offspring reached adulthood. This R vs K spectrum could be simplified as quantity vs quality of offspring. Although perhaps a better way to simplify it for humans would be uninhibited vs inhibited.
.
If we are to carry this theory over to humanity and in turn game, it would lead to the obvious conclusion that not pair bonding, not caring and acting uninhibited would appear more Alpha and these males would have had a selective advantage in the low paternal investment tropics. Conversely, in the Northern latitudes pair bonding Beta males would have had a reproductive advantage, as they were the only ones who would have cared enough and cooperated enough for their woman and offspring to survive.
.
So my following words of advice in regard to Game might come as a shock to some of you purists. Yet I believe they ring true and allow for the most eloquent oversimplification of game yet. If you want to practice good game simply put on a Lil Wayne song and try to emulate and act like an R selected uninhibited black man. In today’s society where infant mortality is minimal and children will survive with or without a father as Daddy Government will suffice instead, being a nice guy and pair bonding will not get you girls, as it is seem by women as a sign of lower social status instinctually. So remember these words to live by.
.
Shorty want a thug
-Lil Wayne aka Dwayne Carter.

Killing the Golden Goose

If you are reading this article chances are that you have lost friends, romantic interests or even a job should you acknowledge your understanding of the world to someone else, who has not themselves come to the same conclusions. Perhaps you have even been accused of being obsessed by these same people. At the very least you have been called “weird” or eccentric. No doubt you have tried to point out the logical fallacies and hypocrisy in the Cultural Marxist version of reality. The experience of having to justify yourself to them is like punching a knife, you will damage yourself in their eyes no matter how you reason with them.  So how than are you supposed to awaken those you care about?
.
Speaking from my own experience, I have had only two ways of achieving success with “normies” as the reactionary sphere has come to call them. These methods should be used after logic, role reversal and pointing out the hypocrisy of modern culture has failed. The first method only appeals to a small set of people who are trained in the hard sciences and statistical analysis. Those with a background in the biological sciences are the most open to conversion. Although I have also had success with students of history. History itself is just biology played out in real time among Homo Sapiens, though usually with a political (((spin))).
.
For these individuals you must first prove your competence in a related matter. This will allow you to start conversations of an intellectual/scientific nature which “accidently” leads into the subject of HBD. Sometimes these people will be very open to these obvious realities, even allowing you to go full bore into sensitive subjects like western population replacement, ethnic differences in behavior and cognition, and even the JQ as its come to be known.
.
However sometimes these educated individuals are of the liberal establishment hivemind and have been conditioned by their Cultural Marxist academic culture to ignore “naughty” thoughts. If this is the case it is best to use a little mental Jujitsu. I suggest tricking them into a logical fallacy by agreeing whole heartedly on a typical progressive issue like abortion. After they nod in approval at your moral signaling say that you think it’s wonderful that we have been able to prevent all these future criminals from being born. This will be sure to send them into a moral clusterfuck. Another tactic which can sadly often be used on SWPL types, is to attract attention to their complete ignorance of politics in general. For example I once dated a girl who claimed she voted Democrat because they were against abortion! I suppose she thought since the left wing always meant more moral and she equated abortion with murder and to came to this conclusion. When I was able to get her to proclaim this in front of her other SWPL friends who actually understood party platforms, they berated her for her stupidity. Social shaming from ones peer group can work wonders to trigger self-doubt and soften up the target for heavier hate facts.
.
However the majority of those you might try to awaken, will not have such an understanding of objective science. Should you try to explain things to them in such a way, you will be treated as a socially inept leper at best and a racist at worst. For these individuals it is best to use scare tactics. By scare tactics I mean pointing out the obvious future of what a majority non-white country or neighborhood means. For many the shock that comes over their face when they think of such a scenario gives me a sense of morbid joy. They realize abruptly, often after a little prodding, that a non-white majority means the end of high trust societies, in which social welfare and a high living standards are possible. Instead it means a future of low trust, corruption and inefficiency at best (i.e. Latin America, and most of Asia) or outright crime, murder, rape and chaos at worse (i.e. Sub Saharan Africa and Haiti).
.
Strangely I have found that non-whites from majority non-white countries and areas, are the most receptive to this tactic. I suppose they have a very real world understanding of which societies and countries are functional and which are not. They most likely have never asked themselves why nations and neighborhoods are the way they are but equate a nice place to live based on the percentage of whites in the area. I once asked a half Mexican/ half Puerto Rican co-worker of mine why Providence Rhode Island had so much crime? He replied “because it’s full of Hispanics.”
.
This tactic also works with the hyper moral SWPL types. Though they are often shocked by the epiphany that results from the realization that a non-white or non-European majority will mean an end to their utopian plans for free healthcare, college, the ability to argue about the gender wage gap, gay rights or environmental issues. To put it simply tell them that a declining white population means a decline in the standard of living for all peoples. When white people disappear the golden goose that gave the world Western Civilization goes with them. To kill us off would be to kill the goose that laid the golden egg. I hope the merchants remember this most of all. My own grandmother once used this analogy on me and it has stuck with me ever since.

The Importance of Novelty and Critical Mass

ok cupdid graph 

It should come as no surprise to anyone with the least bit of objective observational skills, that people are attracted to novelty. The more scarce the novelty generally speaking, the more highly it is sought. This phenomenon can apply to a variety of situations from the latest hard to come by high tech gadget, to a rare baseball card, or even a designer handbag. Though not often discussed, this tendency also applies to mate selection among humans. Traits that vary among the urban populations of the USA and Europe such as hair, eye, skin color and certain facial characteristics, are often seen as more attractive if they are a novelty and in short supply. This phenomenon is also present in virtually every species of sexually reproducing animal. All things being equal some characteristics are more sought after than others, due to a biological preference for bright eye catching colors. Perhaps the only bright side of a declining ratio of white males in society will be there increased value to women.

Yes Internalized preferences can also come into play, if social status or value is placed on a particular trait or set of traits by a culture. However culture or not white males of the fairer variety with light eyes, light hair or simply and of the facial features unique to white males such as a prominent dimpled chin are truly unique. Perhaps your only consolation upon becoming a minority will be you increased value to all races and ethnics groups of women. This will come in spite on how much Hollywood and mass media try and convince white women otherwise.
.

Anyone who travels between countries or even areas within countries like the USA, can see that when a certain race or ethnic group is small or non-existent there is a natural curiosity towards an individual of this group. This curiosity is usually exaggerated if the racial or ethnic novelty is of the opposite sex. Women put much more emphasis on cultural norms and what their peers think than men. As such what men find attractive tends to remain relatively constant regardless of changing cultural pressures. However men have a strong attraction to sexual novelty. Men will always prefer paedomorphic (youthful) or neotonous features. Neotony meaning the retention of juvenile features into adulthood such as small noses, soft skin, hairlessness, and large eyes.

.

This mode of selection intensifies when one sex outnumbers the other. The sex in excess supply has to compete for a mate and resorts to the same strategies that advertisers use to grab attention such as the use of eye catching or rare colors. Color polymorphisms or rare color variations that do not give a survival advantage in a species thus evolve to catch the attention of the opposite sex. However as soon as one color polymorphism becomes too common it loses its novelty and sexual selection for this trait ceases reverting back to the rarer color. American researcher Tomas Thelen demonstrated this phenomenon in humans through an experiment using varying percentages in hair color among models. Thelen prepared three series of slides featuring attractive women. The first one with 6 brunettes, another with 1 brunette and 5 blondes, and a third with 1 brunette and 11 blondes.  Male subjects then had to select the woman in each series they would most prefer to marry. For the same brunette, preference increased significantly from the first to the third series, increasing in proportion to the rarity of the brunettes.

.

In most species the selection is on males. As can be seen with male song birds, peacocks and lions with their brightly colored feathers and manes. Rare color advantages have been studied most extensively in shorter lived species like guppies and fruit flies. The method of selection for such novel colors remains unclear. It might stem from the selection for beneficial mutations in a population. 90-99% of mutations are detrimental to an organisms survival.(Nicholas Wade 2014) If an organism in a population was to survive with such a mutation and not be picked off by predators or succumb to disease, it probably conveys a survival advantage in that particular environment. Color polymorphisms are also selected against when there is the presence of a related species or subspecies within the same geographic range, apparently because too much intraspecific variability makes it harder to recognize one’s own species and leads to hybridization and the extinction of the population or unique genetic group.

.

These tendencies can be observed increasingly in the current situation of the Western Countries such as the United States and Europe. In earlier generations there was a strong attraction by native European descended women to exotic men as they were a novelty. However in recent decades the nonwhite male population of the west have increased to a point where they are no longer the exception but the norm.

.

In the USA currently the majority of males born each year are nonwhite and they are the majority of the under 18 male population. As it should be obvious white males are the only ones who exhibit diversity in hair and eye color polymorphisms. If we track a color polymorphism like blue eyes in men from 1900 thru 2006, we can see just how novel “white features” are becoming. In 1900 when 80% of people married within their ethnic group, more than 50% of men in the USA of all races, African Americans included, had blue eyes. In 1950 due to an increase in intermarriage between European ethnic groups in the USA, this proportion fell to 1/3 of all American Men including all races. Blue eyes are a recessive trait and only perpetuate themselves if a blue eyed individual mates with another individual processing at least one allele for blue eyes. Yes, eye color is polygenetic but being homozygous for the gene OCA2 confers a 90% chance of having blue eyes. (“Eye color and the prediction of complex phenotypes from genotypes. Current Biology. 19) Homozygous means that you poses two identical copies of the gene for a particular trait. As out-marriage and nontraditional immigration increased since the 1970s, blue eyes continued to become scarcer. As of 2006 only one in 6 American men had blue eyes. (Boston Globe October 2006, Don’t It make My Blue Eyes Brown)

.

As one would imagine if blue eyes were to become scarce in the men of a population there would be an increased desire for males with this characteristic. The same goes for any of the stereotypically “white” features such as green eyes, blonde or red hair. This tendency would be increased if the females came from a group where light eyes and light hair were rare to nonexistent. With this being said it should come as no surprise that recent statistics published by the dating site OK Cupid have drawn attention to the overwhelming preference of Asian and Hispanic women for white men. The data showed the response rates to messages of various heterosexual users by race to members of the opposite sex based on the race of their sender. The data was tracked between 2009 and 2014 and held relatively constant from year to year, with a slight increase in attraction to white men by Asian and Hispanic women, over the years cited. White women also preferred white men over other groups but not as much as Asian and Hispanic women. The only group that did not prefer white men were black women. Explaining this exception could be a self-selecting tendency of black female OK Cupid users. Since there are far more educated black females in white color fields than black males, an overwhelming number of black females online are probably searching for equally accredited black males as so few exist in their immediate vicinity. Black female college graduates outnumber black males by 2 to 1 and black females with graduate degrees outnumber black males 3 to 5 as of 2008. (Department of Education 2009) Strangely enough the lowest response rates to white women were from white males, while the highest response rates from white males were to Asian women. Additionally, all males with the notable exception of Asian males, responded to Asian women in the greatest percentage. Asian males showed the highest response rates to Hispanic females. Just what explains the attraction of Asian males to Hispanic females I have no theory for.

ewww-yellow-fever-only-dates-white-guys

.

The fact that this data is drawn from the online dating world could skew the results, as online dating self-selects for certain individuals who may not be looking for the same thing as those who meet in person, the traditional way. That being said proportionally far less women are going to nightclubs and bars in comparison to earlier eras. It has gotten to the point where a record number of establishments have had to close down due to lack of patronage. Men in general will only spend money at a nightclub if they have the promise of meeting a woman, and with virtually every major nightclub now in the USA having a higher ratio of men than women, many men are dropping out of nightlife as well. To see this point illustrated, you need only use any number of Smartphone Apps that track the sex ratio of various night time establishments and report them back in real time. Scene Tap is the most well-known. Some like the blogger Ram Z Paul, have theorized the fall off is due to increasing proportions of more aggressive nonwhite males at establishments, who in turn drive away women from more high trust ethnicities. The real answer can probably be found in the use of hook up apps like Tinder which give young women a never ending supply of male suitors to keep them entertained without the cost of going out. Since Tinder appeared in 2012 there has been a growing trend in night club closings. The city of Boston which I traverse regularly, is now littered with unused bars and clubs that have closed up shop. So the data Ok Cupid reports is most likely a very accurate picture of today’s 21-35 crowd in America.

.

But what does all this mean if you are a European descended male, especially one with fairer features? Well if trends persist, as the attraction to novel eye catching features does in the animal world, it means that white men with light hair and light eyes will become ever more sought after by women of all races and no amount of Hollywood or media demonization will be able to undo that. This trend seems to have already taken hold in the USA, with its nonwhite majority looming. As for Europe there has traditionally been a high miscegenation rate for nonwhite men coupling with indigenous European females. Current scenes coming out of Europe during this migrant crisis is creating a different scenario. With the exploding number of aggressive, rape prone Arab and African men reaching critical mass, European women have cease to find them exotic. In these progressive times dark and handsome has given way to dark and scary.

Learning From Your Enemies

Perhaps enemy is too strong a term. But seeing as most people are incapable of differentiating between gradients of a spectrum and see the world in terms of good or bad, us and them, moral and abhorrent, I feel the need to use this term. What I really mean is not so much enemy but “other.” In the growing sphere of the reactionary world there is the tendency to cling to rigid hierarchy and traditionalism. While maintaining a strong bias toward all things noble, chivalrous and honorable or what our enemies call “dead white male culture.” This tendency to strive to “become who we are” is in part a desire to return our people to healthy, traditional, high trust societies and the behavioral package which is needed for them. However Pandora’s Box has been opened, the enemy is not just at the gates they are the gate keepers and warden of the citadel, dispossessing the villagers of their homes so the barbarians can occupy them instead. In the process helping themselves to the silverware and the farmer’s daughters.

.
This author is not so idealistic or pathologically optimistic to believe that we can really go home again. I am not as concerned with the past as I much I am the future and drastic times call for drastic measures to ensure there is a future. We in the Alt Right reactosphere need to get off our high horses. We need to stop thinking about what should be and consider what is.
.
It would be nice if we could abide by the traditions of our ancestors and form stable nuclear families in societies where courteous steadfast men courted virtuous loyal women. But this is just intellectual role playing it’s not going to happen barring some great cataclysm and collapse of the government welfare state with its quotas, credential seeking and vacuous consumerism.
.
What we need to focus on is what works and quite frankly our chivalrous nature is not working. It has enabled an element of society to emerge which does not respect your generosity. This element sees kindness as weakness. It does not think independently but adheres to a herd mentality, concerned only with their rank in the group and how much material they can horde over their peers. It matters not how they acquire these goods be it by themselves or through association with an obedient wage slave. All things being equal, they will always adhere to whoever or whatever can guarantee them just a little bit more than the last. This little bit more need not be strictly material. It could be as simple as the instinctual thrill they get from your typical Dark Triad individual. The Dark Triad being a set of personality traits, that your typical European descended male has had nearly bred out of him.
.
This element of society which I speak is in truth half of our society and the fairer half at that. If you haven’t guessed it by now I’m referring to women. There is a tendency in the manosphere to blame western women and their indolent disdain for stoic provider types for the state of things. On the other side, the Alternative Right and White Nationalist crowd tends to pedestalize white women as flawless creatures who have been led astray by a hedonistic, nihilistic culture of self. At the same time this culture has left their male compatriots timid, deracinated, manlets.

.
Perhaps both sides are wrong. Perhaps we are merely products of a biological package not evolved to live in such a time or place. Weather a population evolved under the constant ebb and flow of advancing glaciers and steppe tundra, ever had the devil may care, lothario attitudes needed in today’s R selected culture is severely doubtful. Dark Triad traits are simply the behavioral package that goes along with a fast R selected life history strategy. Whatever the origin of these behaviors, something startling has occurred regarding their prevalence in recent times. We are only a handful of generations removed from an era when half of children died before their teenage years. In these times it was necessary to have large families as the welfare state did not exist and the only sure way to ensure survival in old age was to produce progeny who would look after you. This harsh reality was especially so for women. Even when one considers the staggering rate of birth related deaths for women, it was still a worse option to grow old and barren with no family than to risk death through childbirth trying to produce one. When one looks at more traditional societies or simply ones without government safety nets to fall back on, mothers revered their sons more so than even their daughters. Sons were seen as your ticket to a peaceful old age where you would be supported and cared for. Today a son is just one less person a woman can go shopping with.
.
As such the disdain for white male’s starts early in their lives with their own mothers. In earlier times such women would have made certain to impart more masculine virtues to their sons, as these sons were their insurance policy in old age. Should a boy display cowardly, shiftless or effeminate characteristics mothers traditionally would chastise them for it, as it would not bode well for their own survival down the road.
.
Various examples of this come to mind throughout Western history. Spartan mothers use to tell their sons when embarking on a military campaign “With it or on it” as in return with your shield or being carried on it by others. During a battle in Classical Greece if men were to break ranks and run, they would have to drop their heavy shields in the process. If men stood their ground and were killed, they would be carried home on their large shields. This attitude can be seen even in white American mothers until quite recently. One such mother during the civil war upon learning of her son’s death in battle had only one question for the messenger “was he shot in the front or back?” Upon learning it was the front she replied with the words “good than he didn’t die a coward.” Your average mother nowadays is much more likely to impart the feel good philosophy of “be nice to everyone” or “treat others how you would like to be treated” than instill any protective or fierce instincts in their sons. They do this because they no longer need their sons outside having pictures to show off to their friends of picturesque little families that fit their ascending office or professional career. If a woman doesn’t  need her son to be a man who will protect her in old age, mothers are less likely to try and steer their sons in such a direction and instead treat them as a sort of pet.
.
Perhaps I am hyper aware of this trend in women as I had the good fortune of growing up next to my gritty realist grandmother, whose own child rearing philosophy was markedly devoid of feel good egalitarianism when compared with that of my own mother’s hyper moral “be nice” approach. When I was old enough to understand Grandma would often regal me with stories of suicidal kindness and the problems it will cause for you. As I grew older I learned that being nice often gives you the appearance of weakness and makes you a target of those who do not share your feel good notions of fair play. How much of the problem of weakness among western males stems from women who no longer need to raise steadfast protective sons can only be guessed at. That being said I know my own world view changed dramatically when exposed to the teachings of a woman, who had seen tough times and saw the world for what it is and not what the koombaya crowd wants it to be.
.
As always I speak of averages and quotients but again the exception proves the rule.  This rule just as my grandmother advised me when I brought home my first girlfriend in high school, is that “women don’t like nice guys.” This is perhaps an oversimplification of the mating trends in today’s society. What this statement means is an explanation of the attraction to Dark Triad personality traits. The Dark Triad encompasses narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Evolutionary psychology has come up with some interesting theories to explain attraction to the Dark Triad. However in reality I believe it may be much simpler. Women are attracted to social status as social status secures resources. Males who are secure in their status tend to display less neuroticism and self-doubt than those who are not. A lack of self-doubt often leads to an overly confident uninhibited demeanor, more commonly known as being an “asshole.” Simplified women like assholes because they can afford to be assholes. Nice guys on the other hand are often seen as weak because they appear to be seeking approval or being needy, whether they are or not. Men with social status don’t need to seek approval or apologize.
.
That being said there is a strong genetic component toward male personality traits, which is entirely irrelevant toward whether a man has the confidence boosting, inhibition lowering social status women are attracted too. Most personality traits are between 40-80% heritable with extraversion and aggression being roughly 50% heritable based on twin studies. (Segal and Tellegen) Genes don’t evolve in isolation, rather populations evolve genetics in an interrelated way. If the males of one population were selected for empathy and pair bonding, the females of this population would in turn evolve characteristics which compliment these tendencies such as high social trust and perhaps a more socially dominant nature, as their male counterparts would allow it. If males from another population selected for enmity, low pair bonding and low social trust were suddenly introduced to this once isolated population, the whole matting game would be thrown out of sync. These more aggressive, less caring males displaying more of the Dark Triad traits would be seen by the women as more dominant and thus more desirable. These preferences would be exaggerated if in the society women were not dependent on their men for resources.
.
Generally speaking empathy and pair bonding among males usually evolves in cold environments with scarce food resources. In these environment males are constrained by their ability to engage in polygamy by the high labor cost and high  mortality rate of providing this food during winter for their mates and children. Women in such climates are physically incapable of plowing frozen rocky soil or felling large game. Low pair bonding evolves in warmer climates where longer growing seasons and in some cases year round agriculture allows for more plentiful food resources and even the ability of women to provide for their own children as the soil is softer and more fertile. In a society where men could afford more than one wife or simply not have to invest as much in the one they have men would behave very differently. This is the tendency as one moves from north to south in Eurasia. The warmer it gets the less empathy and pair bonding is displayed men. This tendency may be influenced by their culture to a degree but seeing as genes create culture, there is a limiting feedback mechanism so in large groups this makes little difference. As these men are less attached and caring to women, they would be seen as more dominant and desirable by women if suddenly injected into a population without these tendencies.
.
This phenomenon can be readily seen in contemporary Europe as millions of males from warmer climes trek north under the guise as migrants and refugees, to claim mates and assert their dominance over their more empathetic, high trust and respectful hosts. Given these patterns it would be wise for the Euro and White Nationalist crowds to keep some restraint when it comes to pedestalizing the fairer sex of our tribe as they seem increasingly to hate us for it. In essence this proposal could be seen as learning from our enemies and some may have reservations against it as it is a break with the tradition of Western chivalry. However would it really be any different from the actions of our own ancestors, who themselves “culturally appropriated” various functional traditions from other civilizations and tribes? This ability in itself is uniquely Western as no other group until recently, excluding the obvious exception of the Japanese, was able or willing to adopt successfully the practices and modes of another civilization.

Anyways just weighing the options.

nice sperm

 

 

Miscegenation an Objective View

As there is so much pseudo science and politicaly motivated information regarding miscegenation I feel the need to put an article out there to put the matter in context. In regards to the phenomena of miscegenation it must first be defined. The definition of which I will be operating on is the genetic intermingling through sexual reproduction of two populations both genetically and phenotypically distinct from each other. The classical definition of miscegenation would of course be the “interbreeding between races” but seeing as the term race always brings up accusations of “folk taxonomy” or pseudo-science I prefer to use the term continental population or sub species. A population is a group of individuals of one species inhabiting one location and interbreeding and the biological definition of a subspecies being the only valid taxonomic classification below the species level. A species in turn is a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.

.

To understand what a subspecies is it is useful to visualize the 90% rule which says “If 90% of population A differs from 90% of population B” than you have a subspecies. (Mayr, Ernst 1969) To think of it in layman’s terms if you took 100 individuals from one group and 100 from another group mixed them together and were than able to resort them into their original groups by appearance or traits than you have two distinct subspecies. (Whitman 2014) Using this 90% rule it becomes evident that miscegenation is nothing more than the interbreeding between two subspecies. Something which when applied to wolves or wild horses is abhorred by conservationists as it reduces ecological and biological diversity. As the old Green Peace saying goes “extinction is forever.” Though with modern day gene sequencing and reproductive technologies we may need to adjust this adage.

.

In regards to Homo sapiens miscegenation has been going on since the species originated and began spreading out across the globe. In prehistoric times people were far less mobile than they are now and probably didn’t wander far from the place of their birth, at least if they could help it. Traveling into unknown territory with hostile strangers and unknown food supply would have been unadvisable to say the least. Geographical barriers would have also hindered travel and led to further differentiation among the species as mountains, deserts, oceans and islands acted as filters if not total barriers to movement. After the initial colonization of the globe ending after the last Glacial Maxim and rising of sea levels, most people probably did not interact or interbreed with groups that were vastly different from themselves either in looks “phenotype” or in genetics “genotype.” Most certainly no Arctic Inuit ever encountered an Australian aborigine or interbred with one in ancient times.

.
If one population was to travel it would have meant encroaching on another population’s territory and resources which would have resulted in conflict and small scale tribal war often resulting in the genocide of one population through the killing of the males and the enslavement and or intermarriage of the females of the less powerful or less numerous population. In this regard prehistoric humans were very similar to chimps. Male chimps of one interrelated group will stake out a territory, constantly patrol it and explore slightly beyond the boundaries. When they meet males from an unrelated group they will attack them and if numerically superior and kill them. Neighboring bands of chimps will repeat this process to each other until all the males of one group are killed off. When this happens they kill the juvenile chimps and mate with the females of the defeated group. Similar to how the Greeks threw Trojan babies from the walls during their sack of Troy.
The real question is why do males of rival population seek to kill the males of another population? To answer this we must look at the world through a strictly genetic sense and inquire into the life work of evolutionary biologists Edward O Wilson and William D Hamilton.

.
Both men wished to answer the question of “altruism” among social insects such as bees and ants. Altruism is a behavior that decreases an individual’s fitness and increases the fitness of another around it. In other words why do social insects form complex social groups and sacrifice their own “fitness” or genetic survival for that of their related kin. This issue perplexed even Charles Darwin. Hamilton’s work led to the revolutionary theory of “kin selection and inclusive fitness.” Simply put Hamilton determined it was useful to think of “survival of the fittest” from the point of view of “individual genes.” Humans for example share 50% of their genes with their siblings and 12.5% with their cousins. You pass on 50% of your genes to your children, 25% to your grandchildren and 12.5% to your great grandchildren. In essence a gene that caused you to sacrifice your life to save two siblings or eight cousins would be beneficial and spread among the group as a percentage of your genes would survive even if you did not. In the case of ants who are 75% related to their siblings (through complicated genetics I won’t get into) this behavioral is even more extreme leading only one ant or bee in the colony to reproduce and the rest to support her. This same tendency to favor close genetic relatives exists in all species particularly mammals.

.
But how does this answer the question of male chimps from one population killing males of another? Simply put these chimps are not closely related and by killing other males and “inserting” their own genes into a neighboring population by reproducing with their females, they are effectively destroying the genetic fitness of the neighboring population and advancing their own. Behavior that harms another organism with no apparent benefit to one’s self Hamilton termed “spiteful behavior” but in reality it is beneficial as it destroys or hinders genes that are in competition with the perpetrator’s genes. This in a nutshell is genetic similarity theory. My genes are in competition with your genes but helping those who are genetically similar to me helps my genes survive and hurting those who are genetically dissimilar to me prevents competition from rival genes.

.
So where does this leave the offspring of males who produced offspring with dissimilar populations? Well it depends on how dissimilar, how extensive the intermingling and the paternal groups attitudes towards the offspring. In the case of humans several scenarios have emerged under different circumstances throughout history. In the case of the Mongol conquest of Eurasia war rape and bride taking of non-Mongol women was common. From a genetic testing it’s has been determined the male lines of Central Asia are heavily East Asian while the female lines are heavily Western Eurasian (European or Iranic). Likewise in the Americas the Mestizo and Mulatto populations are heavily European on the male line but Amerindian and West African on the female line, though this varies in percentage by region and social class.

.
The present day Northern Russian population demonstrates the direction in which admixed genes strive for and that is the dominance and eventual hard sweep of the subjugated group’s alleles. A hard sweep is the removal of a certain genetic allele or alleles from a population. An allele in turn is one of alternative forms of a gene that arise by mutation and is found at the same place on a chromosome. It is well known that there are genetic affinities with Asian or Mongoloid looking Siberian groups among the peoples of the northern Russian forest. However unlike these seemingly related Siberian groups the North Russians do not possess the EDAR gene which gives East Asian Mongoloid peoples there characteristic eye shape, hair texture, shovel shaped incisors and dry earwax. This seems a paradox for a people who have ancestry from a group with the EDAR gene unless one consider purifying selection or the removal of an allele or in this case multiple alleles from a population.

.
Consider the following scenario. If one population is fixed at 100% for the A allele and another population is fixed at 100% for the B allele and if only males of population A mixed with the females of population B than the first generation would be 50% fixed for A and 50% fixed for B. By random chance each succeeding generation would see the ratio of these alleles fluctuate. If there was discrimination in favor of a certain phenotype or look caused by allele A than allele B would suffer. If there was discrimination against the look caused by allele B than A would gain in percentage as people choose to mate with individuals possessing A over B. If a group like North Russians were to have a preference for European features or just an internalized hatred of East Asian features and if these pressures were strong enough, than in following generations one phenotype and in turn genotype would prevail. To put it in layman’s terms Mongoloid genes seem to have been bred out of the North Russian population. A similar pattern may have happened in Finnish peoples as they share the same genetic affinities.

.
Similar instances have occurred in India and Latin America where racial caste systems have sprung up from historical intermingling of genetically distinct populations. The Caste system in India is the result of Indo-Aryan invaders from Central Asia conquering Dravidian peoples who in turn conquered Andaman Islander “negrito” like peoples. Other groups also added to the genetic medley with the introgression of East Asian, Austro Asiatic speaking peoples from the Burmese Border and other East Asian peoples from Nepal and Mughal Conquest. However in spite of the great injection of intermingling peoples the tendency after these initial conquests seems to have been genetic segregation with people breaking into endogamous groups based on appearance and in turn genetic similarity.

.
Likewise in Latin America a more recent phenomenon is scene with mate preference for European phenotypes. This has produced an upper class which ancestrally is not entirely white genetically though in appearance is. They may express European phenotypes but when put to genetic testing there is often low lying Amerindian and West African DNA. In the case of Argentina such extreme mate preference occurred that the traditional indigenous and African population of the country is virtually nonexistent today even if you may be able to detect it at low levels in the modern day white populations DNA.

.
This tendency of genes to separate along lines of genetic similarity does not stop at mixed populations. Studies of sexually active couples and marriage partners among homogeneous populations show that when their genetics are analyzed they are more similar than the average individuals in that population. (Rushton, 1989) For most of human history the tendency outside of conquest was for people to marry somewhat distant relatives. In more traditional areas of the world like the Middles East and South Asia as many as 53% of people still marry first or second cousins as is the case with Iraq. (HBD Chick, FDB Cousin Marriage and clans and tribes in Iraq) In Pakistan the world leader in cousin marriage it reaches 70%. If all of human history was tallied it’s estimated that 80% of all marriages have been to first or second cousins. (BrighterBrains.org Cousin Marriage in Pakistan)

.
This innate often extreme desire to seek common genes is the very basis for ethnic group and sub species formation. Given enough time and isolation a group will continue to intermingle until all individuals in the population are interrelated. Most people alive today are heavily interrelated with their co-ethnics if you consider the size and scope of family trees. Going back 8 generations you have 1024 openings in your family tree, thirty generations ago it reaches a billion and forty generations ago it reaches a trillion! Of course there were not a trillion people alive in 1000 A.D. so you are descended from multiple pathways from the same ancestors. This explains why ethnic groups act altruistic towards their co ethnics more so than out group members as these individuals are in fact their distant relatives who share common genes. By helping these relatives you ensure the survival of your genes.
This endogamy among a population is also how specific traits like eye color, hair color, resistance to disease, body build, cognitive and personality traits become common or even fixed in a population as a favored trait or set of traits is spread within it. The longer two populations have been separated or the greater the selective pressure on the group the more extreme these differences will become.

.
After such divergent evolution if two populations or subspecies come into contact together and reproduce the offspring are often confronted with unforeseen consequences affecting health. In spite of the pop culture belief in “hybrid vigor” or the inheritance of the most desirable traits from both parents the offspring are just as likely to inherit the least desirable traits. Although desirable is a subjective term and can mean different things under different ecological circumstances. Here in lies the biggest hindrance to miscegenation as a desirable phenomenon. If two parents evolved to fit very different ecological niches interbreed they often pass on genes to their offspring that do not function well together. As genes do not evolve independently but rather as a package of interworking traits to ensure the survival of their carrier, combining such genetic packages often interferes with their fitness and the ability to form functioning cellular and organ systems. Is it really little wonder than that mixed race children suffer from higher rates of mental illness, allergies, autism, still births and birth defects when compared to mono racial children in the United States? (J. Richard Udry, 1995)
Even the most preferred racial pairing among high IQ types of European Man and East Asian women has been shown to result in exceptionally high rates of birth complications and health problems later in life. ( Race Bias Tracks Conception Risk Across the Menstrual Cycle, Navarrete Michigan State)

.
This purpose of this article is not to necessarily take a side on the issue of miscegenation and designate it as “good” or “bad” as most common people would. Rather I am attempting to explain the biological forces that give us instincts toward our own groups genetic preservation as well as the destruction of other groups genetic integrity via the male desire to dominate outgroup males and copulate with their novel looking females. By doing this a male is effectively destroying the other groups fitness as the progeny of such unions would not be accepted by their own group. In earlier times high childhood mortality rates and strong preferences for progeny that look like the in group would leave such individuals at a biological disadvantage. More often than not these hybrid offspring would separate along genetic similarity lines via genetic segregation and in group preference for homogeneous looking individuals. Just think how children tease and bully the child who has larger ears or a strange looking nose when compared to the rest of the group. Hybrid offspring would either not survive or have their genetic admixture mostly bred out over succeeding generations. This has been the case for much of human existence and the longer the intermixing event between two or more populations the stronger instinct among admixed populations to separate based on appearance. Caste Systems in turn evolved out of this tendency among admixed populations to seek out genetically similar mates.

 

 

Simplified this means although a male may pass on his genes with a genetically dissimilar female he increases the amount of his genes that survive into the next generation if he reproduces with a woman with those same genes. Other out group males in turn will attempt to impregnate women of his in group to decrease his fitness and in turn the fitness of his population

Some Musings On WASPs

Let’s face it WASPS are like Bigfoot a semi mythical creature said to exist by some yet whose very existence as species I have yet to confirm. However there is a creature in the fossil record Gigantopithecus that does prove the existence of a Bigfoot like creature in history overlapping the range of reported sittings of this elusive beast. Likewise WASPS did exist in American history yet in my lifetime I have never had a confirmed sighting rather only second hand reports from individuals who say they have seen WASPS. Moreover from what I can deduce through casual conversation with the huddled masses of “normie” millennials I would argue most do not even know what a WASP is or even understand what the abbreviation stands for. Case in point I was at a bar hitting on a rather in your face Italian American chick from East Boston (I know because I always ask the ethnicity of the girl I’m about to have a go at to see if I can cross off another box on my list) When she replied with “What are you.” After a short round of guessing on her part I replied “I’m a WASP.” She looked at me as if I had 2 heads and replied “What’s that” so of course I explained.
In Boston the supposed habitat of the elusive WASP the only Individuals who seem to know what a WASP is are the ones who have WASPS in their family tree or those who are highly educated beyond your basic marketing or elementary education major. As were the female Chinese American Medical Students who were somewhat enamored by the fact they had cornered the elusive WASP out of his normal habitat at a nightclub in the POZ that is Boston. The only white American girl I encountered who used the word WASP to describe herself was a twenty something recently graduated English major from the well to do town of Williams Massachusetts. She herself did not actually use WASP but “WASPY” as in “I’m not sure what I am I think my family is pretty WASPY.”
Perhaps the reason I have encountered so few WASP’s or people who even understand the term is because at least in New England they are virtually extinct or at least critically endangered for the same reason the Red Wolf is, loss of habitat and interbreeding with other geographically distinct populations. You see in New England the WASPs despite their supposed contempt for the Irish, Italians and other ethnic mostly Catholic white Europeans, were actually very inclusive towards them.

Not only did the WASPs have an open door policy about who could come to this country from Europe, the country they created through bloodshed and imagination, they allowed their most precious institution the Ivy League to remain open to all who were intelligent or studious enough to attend. It was this sense of Universalism and out group trust that lead the WASPs and their fellow North West Europeans “NWE” to create societies and proposition nations that all of Europe and eventually the rest of the world preferred to their own ethnic groups creations. Though the high social trust and Universalist tendencies of the WASP may have been their greatest strength it became their downfall. Just like the tragic epic heroes of Homeric Greece whose greatest quality becomes their undoing, the WASPs desire to see others as brothers and sisters of man as opposed to strangers led more nepotistic, low social trust groups to supplant them from their institutions. Eventually these outsiders married into their very families and through overwhelming numbers and the traditional Catholic penchant for reproduction overwhelmed the WASP and lead to his extinction, at least in the pure form.

The decline of the WASP began during the time of the Irish Potato famine and it accelerated in the turn of the 1900s immigration wave to the USA from Southern and Eastern Europe. The WASPs were dealt their death blow in the post WW2 suburbs that sprung up in the 1950s economic boom where WASPs, Irish, Italians, Poles, Swedes, Greeks, Portuguese, French Canadians, Germans, Lithuanians, Jews and many more all intermingled and intermarried.

I myself am the closest thing to an actual WASP I have yet to really encounter and at that my paternal grandmother and maternal great grandmother married into WASP families themselves from non-Anglo Saxon heritage. So in that respect even this elusive WASP cannot be said to truly exist. But If one wishes to find further proof of the decline of the WASP hierarchy in New England and particularly Boston outside the obvious demographic data of Harvard, I point no further than the governors of the Bay Colony and Mayors of Boston going back to before the Kennedy administration, not a WASP in site.

So the next time you meet a SWPL who is signaling about how moral they are or gets offended easy, I advise you to ask them their ancestry my suspicion is that they are not a Cabot or a Lodge but perhaps an O’Connell or perhaps even Gold.

Merry Christmas ….or Whats Left of It

Merry Christmas!…. or whatever it is we are exactly celebrating these days. I have been advised by recent talking heads on TV, radio and social media that “It is our Christian obligation to take in the Syrian refugees.” and that we have “nothing to celebrate so longs as others suffer.” Well that’s fine and all but as a secular agnostic I take offense at others projecting their religious values upon me and mine this holiday season.

Whatever “white guilt” they feel could be quickly cleansed by a trip to a Syria where they themselves could then administer to the needs of these said refugees or better yet these news anchors could take them into their own palatial McMansions and sponsor them sending teenage Ahkmed to school with their daughters. I suffer no such guilt over the suffering of other people caused by their own co ethnics. I do however feel guilt over non co ethnics causing suffering to my co ethnics because of “do gooder” causes which bring in the refuse of the world to occupy my soil and to live among my nation.

I mean I could understand the Christians if they were actually bringing in actual Syrian Christian refugees. But seeing as the current powers that be seek to bring in over 100,000 Muslims and settle them primarily in areas not among fellow Arabs like in Dearborn Michigan but rather in lily white areas like Montana I am perplexed. If the crisis in Europe is anything to gage these refugees by I will use my powers of deduction and guess they are not refugees but rather economic opportunists at best and hostile occupiers sympathetic to ISIS at worst. With 79% of these refugees being men of fighting age (late teens to late twenties) I highly doubt they are just women and children feeling a war zone. At that depending which organizations estimate you believe 30-90% of these said refugees are not actual Syrians and a miniscule number of those are Syrian Christians with most actual Syrians being Muslims and most of the refugees being from other countries like Pakistan or Iraq. But I digress give todays crop of social media savvy whites a chance to “moral signal” to others just how moral, giving and better than the masses of proles they are and they will. So Instead of trying to rationalize with them or even use emotional outcries about the safety of their own children, that is assuming any of these selfish moral crusading types had children, I will instead put things in perspective.

If the roles were reversed would Arab Muslims take in multitudes of Christian and atheists? Seeing as the rich Gulf Arab states are not taking in their fellow Arab Muslims I think not.

I’m dreaming of a white guilt free Christmas. Sadly I think my stocking will be filled with coal burners.

Merry Christmas