Category Archives: StorminNorman

The Return of The Mannerbund

The Alt Right has a problem. This problem if not dealt with could make or break the future of the movement. The problem I speak of is not subversives entering the movement or (((merchants))) constantly projecting their own fantasies on us via mainstream news. The problem I speak of is a lack of unity and a lack of charisma. Sure the autistes in the movement are great at shit posting on twitter and making dank memes. They even manage to carry out some high profile publicity stunts like the Chalkining and most likely are a guiding influence among the Trump campaign. There may even be some Alt Righters among Trumps advisors. So what is wrong with autistes you ask?
.
The problem I speak of is a problem of charisma or better yet a problem of drive. To understand what I mean I would like to reference a scene in Braveheart when Longshanks states “the problem with Scotland is its full of Scots.” Yes this is our problem we are full of autistes who would rather sit at home on a Friday night than go to a bar throw back a few drinks and find a girl. So I am going to take a lesson from Islam and our own European tribal past and suggest we organize “Mannerbund” groups for the sole purpose of carousing, going out to bars and meeting women. More importantly just as Longshanks stated in Braveheart “This should fetch just the sort of lords I need.” Such a strategy could fetch just the sort of men the Alt Right needs to succeed beyond the Animae watching “neets” the media portrays us as.
.
“Every Other Tribe Seeks to Fuck Your Women Its Time You Return the Favor”
.
If you go to a club, bar or even a large social event like the St. Patrick’s Day parade I attended this year in Boston, you are going to notice a pattern. When you do see a mixed race or mixed ethnic couple under 30, it is more often than not going to be a White woman with a nonwhite man. Of the roughly 2 dozen inter racial couples I walked by on the way to the bar, all were White female with nonwhite male with the exception of one white SWPL male dating an Indian girl of the dot variety. More importantly I saw an equal amount of Asian male White female couples, compared to the usual Black male White female couples. Of course there were all sorts of Middle Eastern, Mestizo and Dominican Mulatto type males with pretty blondes on their arms, or should I say with hand on ass. The traditional standby of White Male Asian Female was all but absent, as was any White guy dating anything but the typical entitled and often fat White girl. So what the hell is going on?
.
In a recent article for Taki’s Magazine Love Is Still Not Colorblind, Steve Sailer followed up on a 1997 article in which he tried to explain the disparities among interracial couples. Back in 1997 Black husband White wife couples were 2.5 times more common than the reverse and White husband Asian wife couples were 2.5 time more common than the reverse. However Sailer reported a new statistical trend today. While the trend for Black male White female couples held steady, the Asian ratio had almost reached parity. Yes those Beta male Asians are getting White girls. So why is this? Sailer argues that it’s because American culture is Masculinizing and makes for more attractive men and less attractive women. I think the truth is far more repugnant.
.
My theory is drawn from biological reality and historical fact. When one tribe of men invade a new territory they subdue the men and have their way with the women. More often than not they killed the men and male children and used the females for recreational purposes. Did Odysseus not throw Hectors son from the walls of Troy? Was the Trojan priestess Cassandra not raped by Greeks? In the process they create a mixed breed underclass along with a more ethnically intact upper class which lorded over the half castes. This was true for the Mongol hordes, Ottoman Turks, Arabs, Moors, the Bantu tribes of Africa, the Siberian Cossacks, Amerindian tribes and more recently Spanish Conquistadors. Though the Conquistadors seemed to have mixed less out of a rape and pillage attitude than due to a lack of Spanish women in the Americas. This tendency also exists in social animals, male Chimps and Lions even do it!
.
And yes White man now it’s your turn. All the disparate tribes invade your countries and the men of these more vigorous tribes are fucking your women. However should you approach a woman from one of these tribes when she is in the company of her own you will be rebuked or even physically attacked as I have. This is also true of those model minority Asian males. Go to any area with a significant Asian presence. You will notice while an Asian woman is near Asian men they will do anything and everything to prevent her from talking to a round eye. I have even seen them start fights over females who are complete strangers to them. In cities like Boston with a large and growing Asian presence this animosity among Asian males toward White males in the sexual marketplace is growing ever stronger. It’s gotten to the point where if I’m in a club that’s more than 20% Asian I leave.
.
However the reverse is not true. It’ been almost a decade since I joined the 21 and over night life scene and I have yet to see a group of White men reprimand a Non White male for approaching or being with a White Woman. But I have seen Dindus, Mystery meat Hispanics, all types of Kebabs, South Asians from the Sub Continent and especially East Asians do it. Of course all the while they are chasing the fairest of white women. To them fucking a blonde or red head is a badge of honor among the males of their community.
.
So how do we counteract this without getting arrested for a micro aggressive hate crime? Simple we beat them at their own game. We form a Mannerbund of base White Males for the sole purpose of reasserting our status with our own women and plundering the women of other non-European descended groups. Now this is not an open invitation to miscegenation. Remember you are White men and you should have the agency to wear protection or at least pull out.
.
I speak from personal experience having partaken in the charms of females from various ethnic groups and origins. That’s how I ended up in the Alt Right in the first place. The more women you bed from a non-European background or even different European backgrounds, the more you will realize we are not all the same and that women the world over from less altruistic societies really do worship the strong jawed white male even if our own women do not. Go forth my brothers and reassert your dominance over these orcs and uppity invaders. Just make sure you do it in a Mannerbund, as their is strength in numbers and in unity. In a world where White Male retaliation against invading hoards assaulting our women is verboten, it would be best to beat the invaders at their own game lest you be swept aside for Jamal, Akmed or even Chang and your genes extinguished.
branigans law

The Importance of Art

Trying to convince normal people of the realities of the world is like herding cats. They will not listen to you and they will most likely run from you the harder you try to present your case. They are so indoctrinated by the modern culture of double standards and anti-white ideology that they can’t see the forest through the trees. They will constantly cherry pick examples from the nightly news or their individual lives in order to desperately hold on to their world view. So how are you supposed to make people aware of what’s right in front of their eyes? The answer can be found in art. As the following experiences have taught me.
.
Statistics and meta-analysis mean nothing to the average person. They do not understand even the most basic of such concepts. Rather they rely on their emotions and sense of morality to decide what to believe. When you point out the news only shows stories that fit the narrative of the “evil” white male oppressing everyone, they will simply call you a racist or crazy. This is particularly so of women. Your average woman only seeks to maintain the “status quo” or culture of the current year. From an evolutionary standpoint this was always the safest thing for them to do. In my experience even the most politically correct attempts to point out the obvious will lead to a cascading series of accusations. “You’re saying that ethnic groups have different averages for IQ so you must think all blacks are retarded! I bet you wouldn’t say that to a black persons face! I can’t stand a person who thinks like you, get away from me!” Forget the fact these people don’t understand the concept of a bell curve, a standard deviation, regression to the mean or even that half of people are above and below average.
.
Funny enough the earlier example was from a mixed race girl who was very easy to convince of the JQ “Jewish Question” and the Jewish tendency to undermine their host nation and host population. She also took to the fact that North East Asians have a higher IQ than most groups easily, as she works for a few. The second a fact might reflect badly on her potential status in a racially aware population, she could not handle it. However she was instinctively far more of a race realist in mate preference, where she choose to live or the types of TV she watched than she will ever realize. More importantly she was far more of a race realist than the vast majority of White American girls.
.
I’ve never actually never been called a racist by a female who does not fit the Nordic ideal. The only women who have ever called me racist are those of the Northern European variety. In these instances I never even attempted to red pill them but rather would simply point out the obvious. “It’s so hard being a woman in this city” one girl complained. “Every day I walk by this church and the men on the stairs yell the most vile things at me and sometimes even try to touch me” a 23 year old girl from lily white New Hampshire once told me. I simply asked her “What kind of men where they? Where they men like me?” After a few more probing questions she realized I was asking what race where the men. To which she replied with an inner horror and accused me of being a “white supremacist.”
.
Another leggy, blonde bombshell college student was once telling me of her travels in Europe. As I had not been there during the current migrant crisis, I asked her opinion on it. She replied with your typical SWPL “We need to help these poor people.” When I asked her about the sex ratio of the migrants or their ages she seemed baffled. “What do you mean she asked” and of course I pointed out that these people were not women and children but close to 90% military aged men who once in Europe began robbing and raping with no response from the cucked cops. She of course called me a racists and said people should be able to “move wherever they want.” That was the end of the conversation.
.
However I have had successes. These victories came not from logical debate but rather through art. I have always had a flair for culture, museums and of course good movies. Most men can make use of these in the dating battlefield. If you wish to demonstrate the obvious, finding the rare movie which portrays the world in a realistic light will do more to convince a woman then any book. Some favorites of mine are the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, The Last of the Mohicans, Apocalypto and any other Mel Gibson movie for the most part. Gran Torino is another one as it simply points out that all too often it’s a white man who willingly sacrifices himself to save another race, while forsaking his own. But of course the majority of movies will spin a very different narrative and are best avoided. Most powerful of all however is a trip to a museum, a national park or some grandiose achievement or Western peoples. Great Works of classical art are awe inspiring to women. They are a tool to raise awareness of the ethnicity of the peoples who created them. Often you will find “art” from more primitive tropical areas of the world next to the work of a Dutch Master or Renaissance Sculpture. Seeing such a comparison can undue years of conditioning by the politically correct establishment.
ChargeofthelightBrigade

Why I No Longer Read ROK and Neither Should You

If you are reading this chances are you either came to this website through Return of Kings or are at least familiar with it. While I was an avid ROK reader in the past, I have mixed feelings about the influence Return of Kings has had on me and as such I have made a concerted effort to avoid venturing anywhere near its URL. My reasons being two fold. First one has to wade through a lot of bad advice and opinion to get to anything worthwhile or useful. Secondly, Roosh and many in the ROK community vehemently ignore objective science and hard data, unless it supports their rape and pillage attitude toward the current state of the west.

Keep in mind a large number of those on ROK are nothing more than thirsty Dravidians, Mongoloids and mystery meat brown men lusting after white women. As such so much of the articles are geared toward advertising the merits of nonwhite women to white men and also teaching nonwhite men how to score with white women. I myself fell upon many dusky skinned temptresses at the advice of Roosh. I also threw away one of the few if only “pristine” white American women I had due to the retarded PUA mentality Roosh advises. Strangely he himself steers clear of all women now but the fair skinned Slavic and Nordic variety. As a once long time defender of ROK I now believe it should change its name to Roost of Kebabs.

Furthermore after meeting many in the ROK community I have come to realize many of these men should NOT be giving advice on women. Though there are obviously men within the fold of ROK that do very well with the ladies, a large segment seem to me to be nothing more than avid readers and writers of fiction, in a Penthouse forum sort of way. However as with all things even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally. As such I will admit that ROK did wake me up to the overwhelming subversive nature of Jewish intellectual and political movements on Western Civilization. I already had an understanding of their influence on second and third wave feminism, though not so much as to why they shoved it down the Goyim’s throat.

But for those of you who have a strong attachment to ROK, if you have found yourself here than the website has most likely given you all it can. Once I woke up to the reality of hypergamy, white knitting, oneittis, the Dark Triad and the degenerate influence modern western culture is having on women, I had learned all I could from ROK. If you already realize that women (with a few exceptions), lack agency and are simply slaves to their primitive emotions and herd mentality, you might be better off investigating the reasons for their enablement. The reallocation of decision making powers in Western Civilization from men to women has been a disaster and allowed to occur at the direct detriment of a healthy society. This was no accidental but rather pushed for by moneyed interests in order to achieve an easily influence mass of pliable voters, who would make decisions not on logic but emotion. For those of you looking for a more realistic view of feminism and the male female dynamic in today’s society, Chateau Heartiste would be a good place to start.

As for Return of Kings most of what pops up on there is the same thing repackaged in a different way to appeal to young horny men who are dissatisfied with their mundane job and lack of pleasant or attractive women. Roosh knows this and he is using the website to pay his bills. He is a merchant of sorts and using ROK to line his pockets to allow for his international playboy lifestyle. In short should you pay any attention to ROK or Roosh’s blog you are a cuck and enjoy subsidizing another man so he can fuck your women. Death to cuckolds! You don’t deserve to reproduce and if I could choke you through the internet I would.

Musings on Merkel

Merkel’s delusional claims echo her comments made at the end of January this year at a Neubrandberg meeting of her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, where she admitted that “only a small number” of the invaders were “entitled to asylum in the classical definition,” and that she expected the majority “currently residing in Germany to return to their home countries.”

She said at that meeting that “most refugees” were being given “temporary protection” which was “initially limited to three years.”

“We expect that, if again there is peace in Syria and if the IS in Iraq is defeated, that they will return back to their homeland with the knowledge [education] that they have acquired from us [to rebuild their countries].”

Merkel referred to a project launched by the Interior and Foreign Ministries to “train Syrians in disaster relief organization.”

This knowledge, she said, would “help them rebuild their country.”

“Not every refugee is here to stay,” Merkel continued. “Many want to live in their homes with their families again.”

Merkel’s delusion—apparently shared by her party—is therefore that the “asylum seekers” are all bona fide “refugees” from the war in Syria—even though their own figures show that those claiming to be Syrians are an absolute minority of those coming into Germany.

The Greek government, for its part, is on record as saying that more than 90 percent of the invaders are bogus refugees.

In fact, as pointed out and known by all sane observers, there are in fact no genuine asylum seekers at all in Europe, because each and every one of them has left a safe third country to reach Europe.

It is therefore safe to assert that every single “asylum seeker” who has come to Europe is bogus—and have acted in bad faith from the very beginning.

Merkel’s claim that the hordes of nonwhite invaders, who have lied their way into Europe, are going to all peacefully “go home” once the Russian air force and the Syrian government has crushed IS, is an indication that she is either impossibly stupid, or very evil

Game Simplified

Simplify, simplify, simplify.
-Henry David Thoreau

.

Everyone reading this must be aware of a concept called Game. If you are not familiar with the term than either you are a natural or you are a recluse who needs to get out more. For most of you the term Game should be self-evident and may conjure up various images of a smooth talking man at a cocktail bar chatting up some doe eyed vixen, while she hangs on his every word. For those of you who grew up in a culture inundated with hip hop, Game might evoke an image of some brash urban lyricist hollering that bitches ain’t shit but hoes and tricks. This was my first introduction to Game and I will always equate not giving a fuck with Game. In order to have good Game one must know what Game is and the easiest way to understand something is to simplify it into its most basic components. As such the following piece in essence will be an attempt to simplify Game.
.
What is Game in reality? There is so much questionable information in the Man-o-sphere and Return of Kings especially, that one can often become lost as to what Game is and how you can practice “good Game.” In many ways listening to others discuss their version of Game ruined my own game. I believe there are several reasons for this. First off, if you become self-conscious of your own actions you often hesitate, and hesitation comes off as nervousness to a woman. This is a huge turn off to her evolutionary instinct to seek out a capable man. Furthermore, after meeting several members of the ROK community, I feel at least 50% embellish their personal experiences. As the old saying goes don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story. For a select few, I feel most of what they claim is in reality complete bullshit, and no one should follow their advice as it does not work but just sounds appealing to aspiring PUAs.
.
I also sense a good portion of the advice given on ROK is dependent on the practitioner. As my father use to say “It’s not the arrow that kills you, it’s the Indian.” This observation also applies to what I have seen of game played out in the real world. You could lack any game whatsoever but if you look like a young Brad Pitt you are going to get attention from the ladies no matter what. On the flip side if you are obese game will not help you though celebrity might.
.
I have seen different gradients of game work for different individuals, under different circumstances. For example if you are a fairly muscle bound individual and look like a gym rat, nice guy game often will get you father than you think. Conversely being aggressive and cocky will work more in your favor if you look non-threatening. So for men that weight 140 pounds or aren’t over 6 foot 4 you might have more success with this strategy. For taller men or simply men who look musclebound you can get away with more of a nice guy approach, as women are less likely to question your dominance. So in this respect much of game could be summed up as different strokes for different folks. However I am attempting to simplify game not make it more complex and to do this I will break it down to its most basic biological components. These components being reproductive strategy and life history strategy.
.
As the various populations of this world evolved to fit different ecological niches they developed different strategies towards reproduction. For populations evolved under the harshest conditions of the last ice age, high paternal investment, pair bonding, altruism and a reserved, inhibited personality was selected for. For populations from warmer climates lower paternal investment, lower pair bonding, lower altruism and more aggressive, uninhibited personalities were selected for.
In the ROK community and various politically incorrect segments of the Manosphere, there is the tendency to classify black men as natural Alphas and conversely Europeans and Northern Asians as being more beta. If we hold the Alpha beta Omega spectrum to be fact than, there is a lot of truth to this statement. But if this is true it must be explained from an evolutionary biology standpoint.
.
In northern regions of the world, especially during the last ice age, food was scarce and the climate harsh. The only food available for most of the year would have been large game like Mammoths, Mastodons, Aurochs and other large extinct mammals. As women were not physically suited to kill such animals with stone weapons, this task fell to men. As such if men of these regions did not stick around after impregnating their women to help feed, clothe and protect their pregnant female partners and offspring, their children would have died and their genes would have died with them. As such there was evolutionary selection for men who empathized and bonded with their women and children. Layman would call this love or in the case of the Manosphere oneitis.
.
Additionally men from Northern climates would have evolved to cooperate and work together with their male peers as it was the only way to hunt such large animals. As such trying to impregnate your fellow tribe member’s woman or constantly fighting with him over women, would not have been a good strategy for the long term survival of your tribe in such a cold climate. Northern forest and arctic tribes have mostly lived by the standard of one man one woman as it allows for cooperation and the manpower needed to both hunt and fight the elements.
.
Conversely men from warmer and especially tropical areas of the world did not need to hang around or invest much in their offspring as the women of these climates could simply gather plant based food or scavenge meat. As such, it was far more advantageous for men from these climates not to pair bond with one partner but instead compete with other men and try and impregnate as many women, as possible as their children stood a good chance of surviving without them around. It should also be noted that tropical diseases led to a high infant and child mortality rate and this would have led toward a tendency toward a higher birth rate to compensate. Populations in between the tropics and colder north would have evolved in between the two extremes. This is especially so in warmer agricultural areas where male investment was higher than in the tropics due to farm work. However the longer growing seasons and more abundant food allowed for polygamy and in turn religions like Islam developed.
.
As many of you reading this probably know, the late great Phillipe Rushton tried to simplify race and ethnic differences in personality, cognition and physical characteristics into a biological spectrum termed R vs K life history strategy. This R vs K spectrum was originally developed by E.O. Wilson to explain the differences in life span, maturation, and paternal investment among organisms. More complex organisms tend to evolve smaller litter sizes, longer childhoods and more paternal investment under conditions where resources are scarce and more care would be required to ensure that each offspring reached adulthood. This R vs K spectrum could be simplified as quantity vs quality of offspring. Although perhaps a better way to simplify it for humans would be uninhibited vs inhibited.
.
If we are to carry this theory over to humanity and in turn game, it would lead to the obvious conclusion that not pair bonding, not caring and acting uninhibited would appear more Alpha and these males would have had a selective advantage in the low paternal investment tropics. Conversely, in the Northern latitudes pair bonding Beta males would have had a reproductive advantage, as they were the only ones who would have cared enough and cooperated enough for their woman and offspring to survive.
.
So my following words of advice in regard to Game might come as a shock to some of you purists. Yet I believe they ring true and allow for the most eloquent oversimplification of game yet. If you want to practice good game simply put on a Lil Wayne song and try to emulate and act like an R selected uninhibited black man. In today’s society where infant mortality is minimal and children will survive with or without a father as Daddy Government will suffice instead, being a nice guy and pair bonding will not get you girls, as it is seem by women as a sign of lower social status instinctually. So remember these words to live by.
.
Shorty want a thug
-Lil Wayne aka Dwayne Carter.

AI Academic Interview Series 7: HBD Pacific Rim

AI Academic Interview Series 7: HBD Pacific Rim. Ritter interviews Storminnorman on the anthropology and genetic history of Australia and the Americas. How did the Aborigines get to Australia? Did they interbreed with earlier hominids like homo erectus? Also, several waves of migration entered the Americas before Columbus. What can genetics tell us about the Amerindians?

Killing the Golden Goose

If you are reading this article chances are that you have lost friends, romantic interests or even a job should you acknowledge your understanding of the world to someone else, who has not themselves come to the same conclusions. Perhaps you have even been accused of being obsessed by these same people. At the very least you have been called “weird” or eccentric. No doubt you have tried to point out the logical fallacies and hypocrisy in the Cultural Marxist version of reality. The experience of having to justify yourself to them is like punching a knife, you will damage yourself in their eyes no matter how you reason with them.  So how than are you supposed to awaken those you care about?
.
Speaking from my own experience, I have had only two ways of achieving success with “normies” as the reactionary sphere has come to call them. These methods should be used after logic, role reversal and pointing out the hypocrisy of modern culture has failed. The first method only appeals to a small set of people who are trained in the hard sciences and statistical analysis. Those with a background in the biological sciences are the most open to conversion. Although I have also had success with students of history. History itself is just biology played out in real time among Homo Sapiens, though usually with a political (((spin))).
.
For these individuals you must first prove your competence in a related matter. This will allow you to start conversations of an intellectual/scientific nature which “accidently” leads into the subject of HBD. Sometimes these people will be very open to these obvious realities, even allowing you to go full bore into sensitive subjects like western population replacement, ethnic differences in behavior and cognition, and even the JQ as its come to be known.
.
However sometimes these educated individuals are of the liberal establishment hivemind and have been conditioned by their Cultural Marxist academic culture to ignore “naughty” thoughts. If this is the case it is best to use a little mental Jujitsu. I suggest tricking them into a logical fallacy by agreeing whole heartedly on a typical progressive issue like abortion. After they nod in approval at your moral signaling say that you think it’s wonderful that we have been able to prevent all these future criminals from being born. This will be sure to send them into a moral clusterfuck. Another tactic which can sadly often be used on SWPL types, is to attract attention to their complete ignorance of politics in general. For example I once dated a girl who claimed she voted Democrat because they were against abortion! I suppose she thought since the left wing always meant more moral and she equated abortion with murder and to came to this conclusion. When I was able to get her to proclaim this in front of her other SWPL friends who actually understood party platforms, they berated her for her stupidity. Social shaming from ones peer group can work wonders to trigger self-doubt and soften up the target for heavier hate facts.
.
However the majority of those you might try to awaken, will not have such an understanding of objective science. Should you try to explain things to them in such a way, you will be treated as a socially inept leper at best and a racist at worst. For these individuals it is best to use scare tactics. By scare tactics I mean pointing out the obvious future of what a majority non-white country or neighborhood means. For many the shock that comes over their face when they think of such a scenario gives me a sense of morbid joy. They realize abruptly, often after a little prodding, that a non-white majority means the end of high trust societies, in which social welfare and a high living standards are possible. Instead it means a future of low trust, corruption and inefficiency at best (i.e. Latin America, and most of Asia) or outright crime, murder, rape and chaos at worse (i.e. Sub Saharan Africa and Haiti).
.
Strangely I have found that non-whites from majority non-white countries and areas, are the most receptive to this tactic. I suppose they have a very real world understanding of which societies and countries are functional and which are not. They most likely have never asked themselves why nations and neighborhoods are the way they are but equate a nice place to live based on the percentage of whites in the area. I once asked a half Mexican/ half Puerto Rican co-worker of mine why Providence Rhode Island had so much crime? He replied “because it’s full of Hispanics.”
.
This tactic also works with the hyper moral SWPL types. Though they are often shocked by the epiphany that results from the realization that a non-white or non-European majority will mean an end to their utopian plans for free healthcare, college, the ability to argue about the gender wage gap, gay rights or environmental issues. To put it simply tell them that a declining white population means a decline in the standard of living for all peoples. When white people disappear the golden goose that gave the world Western Civilization goes with them. To kill us off would be to kill the goose that laid the golden egg. I hope the merchants remember this most of all. My own grandmother once used this analogy on me and it has stuck with me ever since.

The Importance of Novelty and Critical Mass

ok cupdid graph 

It should come as no surprise to anyone with the least bit of objective observational skills, that people are attracted to novelty. The more scarce the novelty generally speaking, the more highly it is sought. This phenomenon can apply to a variety of situations from the latest hard to come by high tech gadget, to a rare baseball card, or even a designer handbag. Though not often discussed, this tendency also applies to mate selection among humans. Traits that vary among the urban populations of the USA and Europe such as hair, eye, skin color and certain facial characteristics, are often seen as more attractive if they are a novelty and in short supply. This phenomenon is also present in virtually every species of sexually reproducing animal. All things being equal some characteristics are more sought after than others, due to a biological preference for bright eye catching colors. Perhaps the only bright side of a declining ratio of white males in society will be there increased value to women.

Yes Internalized preferences can also come into play, if social status or value is placed on a particular trait or set of traits by a culture. However culture or not white males of the fairer variety with light eyes, light hair or simply and of the facial features unique to white males such as a prominent dimpled chin are truly unique. Perhaps your only consolation upon becoming a minority will be you increased value to all races and ethnics groups of women. This will come in spite on how much Hollywood and mass media try and convince white women otherwise.
.

Anyone who travels between countries or even areas within countries like the USA, can see that when a certain race or ethnic group is small or non-existent there is a natural curiosity towards an individual of this group. This curiosity is usually exaggerated if the racial or ethnic novelty is of the opposite sex. Women put much more emphasis on cultural norms and what their peers think than men. As such what men find attractive tends to remain relatively constant regardless of changing cultural pressures. However men have a strong attraction to sexual novelty. Men will always prefer paedomorphic (youthful) or neotonous features. Neotony meaning the retention of juvenile features into adulthood such as small noses, soft skin, hairlessness, and large eyes.

.

This mode of selection intensifies when one sex outnumbers the other. The sex in excess supply has to compete for a mate and resorts to the same strategies that advertisers use to grab attention such as the use of eye catching or rare colors. Color polymorphisms or rare color variations that do not give a survival advantage in a species thus evolve to catch the attention of the opposite sex. However as soon as one color polymorphism becomes too common it loses its novelty and sexual selection for this trait ceases reverting back to the rarer color. American researcher Tomas Thelen demonstrated this phenomenon in humans through an experiment using varying percentages in hair color among models. Thelen prepared three series of slides featuring attractive women. The first one with 6 brunettes, another with 1 brunette and 5 blondes, and a third with 1 brunette and 11 blondes.  Male subjects then had to select the woman in each series they would most prefer to marry. For the same brunette, preference increased significantly from the first to the third series, increasing in proportion to the rarity of the brunettes.

.

In most species the selection is on males. As can be seen with male song birds, peacocks and lions with their brightly colored feathers and manes. Rare color advantages have been studied most extensively in shorter lived species like guppies and fruit flies. The method of selection for such novel colors remains unclear. It might stem from the selection for beneficial mutations in a population. 90-99% of mutations are detrimental to an organisms survival.(Nicholas Wade 2014) If an organism in a population was to survive with such a mutation and not be picked off by predators or succumb to disease, it probably conveys a survival advantage in that particular environment. Color polymorphisms are also selected against when there is the presence of a related species or subspecies within the same geographic range, apparently because too much intraspecific variability makes it harder to recognize one’s own species and leads to hybridization and the extinction of the population or unique genetic group.

.

These tendencies can be observed increasingly in the current situation of the Western Countries such as the United States and Europe. In earlier generations there was a strong attraction by native European descended women to exotic men as they were a novelty. However in recent decades the nonwhite male population of the west have increased to a point where they are no longer the exception but the norm.

.

In the USA currently the majority of males born each year are nonwhite and they are the majority of the under 18 male population. As it should be obvious white males are the only ones who exhibit diversity in hair and eye color polymorphisms. If we track a color polymorphism like blue eyes in men from 1900 thru 2006, we can see just how novel “white features” are becoming. In 1900 when 80% of people married within their ethnic group, more than 50% of men in the USA of all races, African Americans included, had blue eyes. In 1950 due to an increase in intermarriage between European ethnic groups in the USA, this proportion fell to 1/3 of all American Men including all races. Blue eyes are a recessive trait and only perpetuate themselves if a blue eyed individual mates with another individual processing at least one allele for blue eyes. Yes, eye color is polygenetic but being homozygous for the gene OCA2 confers a 90% chance of having blue eyes. (“Eye color and the prediction of complex phenotypes from genotypes. Current Biology. 19) Homozygous means that you poses two identical copies of the gene for a particular trait. As out-marriage and nontraditional immigration increased since the 1970s, blue eyes continued to become scarcer. As of 2006 only one in 6 American men had blue eyes. (Boston Globe October 2006, Don’t It make My Blue Eyes Brown)

.

As one would imagine if blue eyes were to become scarce in the men of a population there would be an increased desire for males with this characteristic. The same goes for any of the stereotypically “white” features such as green eyes, blonde or red hair. This tendency would be increased if the females came from a group where light eyes and light hair were rare to nonexistent. With this being said it should come as no surprise that recent statistics published by the dating site OK Cupid have drawn attention to the overwhelming preference of Asian and Hispanic women for white men. The data showed the response rates to messages of various heterosexual users by race to members of the opposite sex based on the race of their sender. The data was tracked between 2009 and 2014 and held relatively constant from year to year, with a slight increase in attraction to white men by Asian and Hispanic women, over the years cited. White women also preferred white men over other groups but not as much as Asian and Hispanic women. The only group that did not prefer white men were black women. Explaining this exception could be a self-selecting tendency of black female OK Cupid users. Since there are far more educated black females in white color fields than black males, an overwhelming number of black females online are probably searching for equally accredited black males as so few exist in their immediate vicinity. Black female college graduates outnumber black males by 2 to 1 and black females with graduate degrees outnumber black males 3 to 5 as of 2008. (Department of Education 2009) Strangely enough the lowest response rates to white women were from white males, while the highest response rates from white males were to Asian women. Additionally, all males with the notable exception of Asian males, responded to Asian women in the greatest percentage. Asian males showed the highest response rates to Hispanic females. Just what explains the attraction of Asian males to Hispanic females I have no theory for.

ewww-yellow-fever-only-dates-white-guys

.

The fact that this data is drawn from the online dating world could skew the results, as online dating self-selects for certain individuals who may not be looking for the same thing as those who meet in person, the traditional way. That being said proportionally far less women are going to nightclubs and bars in comparison to earlier eras. It has gotten to the point where a record number of establishments have had to close down due to lack of patronage. Men in general will only spend money at a nightclub if they have the promise of meeting a woman, and with virtually every major nightclub now in the USA having a higher ratio of men than women, many men are dropping out of nightlife as well. To see this point illustrated, you need only use any number of Smartphone Apps that track the sex ratio of various night time establishments and report them back in real time. Scene Tap is the most well-known. Some like the blogger Ram Z Paul, have theorized the fall off is due to increasing proportions of more aggressive nonwhite males at establishments, who in turn drive away women from more high trust ethnicities. The real answer can probably be found in the use of hook up apps like Tinder which give young women a never ending supply of male suitors to keep them entertained without the cost of going out. Since Tinder appeared in 2012 there has been a growing trend in night club closings. The city of Boston which I traverse regularly, is now littered with unused bars and clubs that have closed up shop. So the data Ok Cupid reports is most likely a very accurate picture of today’s 21-35 crowd in America.

.

But what does all this mean if you are a European descended male, especially one with fairer features? Well if trends persist, as the attraction to novel eye catching features does in the animal world, it means that white men with light hair and light eyes will become ever more sought after by women of all races and no amount of Hollywood or media demonization will be able to undo that. This trend seems to have already taken hold in the USA, with its nonwhite majority looming. As for Europe there has traditionally been a high miscegenation rate for nonwhite men coupling with indigenous European females. Current scenes coming out of Europe during this migrant crisis is creating a different scenario. With the exploding number of aggressive, rape prone Arab and African men reaching critical mass, European women have cease to find them exotic. In these progressive times dark and handsome has given way to dark and scary.

AI Academic Interview Series 5: The Right Way to do Anthropology

Ritter interviews StorminNorman on physical anthropology. Topics include the work of the late great Carleton Coon, the ethnogenesis of Europeans, and the relationship between linguistic, anthropological and archaeological data. Also included: Balts, Slavs and Tocharians, and where did the Eskimos (the real ones) come from?

Carleton Coon: Harvard mid-twentieth century physical anthropologist, author of The Races of Europe: 3:03

Genetic methods of determining lineages: paternal and maternal haplogroups, special characteristics of Europeans: 8:27

Physical anthropological methods haplogroups,  maternal and paternal lines: 11:40

Out of Africa theory vs Multiregionalism: 13:20

Neanderthals and the founding populations of Europe according to Coon: 17:00

Coon’s theories on European origins vs Kevin Macdonald’s 22:45

Linguistics vs anthropology/archaeology: 24:50

Lithuania, Marija Gimbutas, 28:55

Taxonomy of Indo-European languages: 32:30

Who are the Aryans? Anatolian vs Kurgan hypothesis: 40:50

Lingustic and genetic links between Eurasia and the Americas. Greenberg’s linguistic macro-theory on the Eurasiatic Languages (not Nostratic as Ritter mentions) and: 46:50

Avestan not evidence for Iranian-Indian link: 50:01

Tocharians, linguistic and genetic linkage to Western Europe: 53:24

A tocharian
A Uyghur kid from East Turkistan. A remnant of the Tocharians?

Genotype determines phenotype and Jared Diamond is a retard: 56:06

Difficulties of inter-racial breeding (Haldane’s Rule), Irish-Australian Aborigine runner Patrick Johnson, first non-African to break the 10-second mark in the 100m: 59:30

Note: “K-Mac” refers to Professor Kevin MacDonald of CSLUB

Books mentioned: Nicolas Wade: A Troublesome Inheritance, Marija Gimbutas: The Language of the Godess, David Anthony: The Wheel, The Horse and Language, Colin Renfrew: Archaeology and Language, Beckwith Empires of the Steppes.

Link between Old world and New world languages proven: Edward Vajda of Western Washington University demonstrated the connection between Ket (spoken in Siberia) and the Na-Dene languages of North America, eg Navajo. (A review of his Vajda’s book on the theory).

Learning From Your Enemies

Perhaps enemy is too strong a term. But seeing as most people are incapable of differentiating between gradients of a spectrum and see the world in terms of good or bad, us and them, moral and abhorrent, I feel the need to use this term. What I really mean is not so much enemy but “other.” In the growing sphere of the reactionary world there is the tendency to cling to rigid hierarchy and traditionalism. While maintaining a strong bias toward all things noble, chivalrous and honorable or what our enemies call “dead white male culture.” This tendency to strive to “become who we are” is in part a desire to return our people to healthy, traditional, high trust societies and the behavioral package which is needed for them. However Pandora’s Box has been opened, the enemy is not just at the gates they are the gate keepers and warden of the citadel, dispossessing the villagers of their homes so the barbarians can occupy them instead. In the process helping themselves to the silverware and the farmer’s daughters.

.
This author is not so idealistic or pathologically optimistic to believe that we can really go home again. I am not as concerned with the past as I much I am the future and drastic times call for drastic measures to ensure there is a future. We in the Alt Right reactosphere need to get off our high horses. We need to stop thinking about what should be and consider what is.
.
It would be nice if we could abide by the traditions of our ancestors and form stable nuclear families in societies where courteous steadfast men courted virtuous loyal women. But this is just intellectual role playing it’s not going to happen barring some great cataclysm and collapse of the government welfare state with its quotas, credential seeking and vacuous consumerism.
.
What we need to focus on is what works and quite frankly our chivalrous nature is not working. It has enabled an element of society to emerge which does not respect your generosity. This element sees kindness as weakness. It does not think independently but adheres to a herd mentality, concerned only with their rank in the group and how much material they can horde over their peers. It matters not how they acquire these goods be it by themselves or through association with an obedient wage slave. All things being equal, they will always adhere to whoever or whatever can guarantee them just a little bit more than the last. This little bit more need not be strictly material. It could be as simple as the instinctual thrill they get from your typical Dark Triad individual. The Dark Triad being a set of personality traits, that your typical European descended male has had nearly bred out of him.
.
This element of society which I speak is in truth half of our society and the fairer half at that. If you haven’t guessed it by now I’m referring to women. There is a tendency in the manosphere to blame western women and their indolent disdain for stoic provider types for the state of things. On the other side, the Alternative Right and White Nationalist crowd tends to pedestalize white women as flawless creatures who have been led astray by a hedonistic, nihilistic culture of self. At the same time this culture has left their male compatriots timid, deracinated, manlets.

.
Perhaps both sides are wrong. Perhaps we are merely products of a biological package not evolved to live in such a time or place. Weather a population evolved under the constant ebb and flow of advancing glaciers and steppe tundra, ever had the devil may care, lothario attitudes needed in today’s R selected culture is severely doubtful. Dark Triad traits are simply the behavioral package that goes along with a fast R selected life history strategy. Whatever the origin of these behaviors, something startling has occurred regarding their prevalence in recent times. We are only a handful of generations removed from an era when half of children died before their teenage years. In these times it was necessary to have large families as the welfare state did not exist and the only sure way to ensure survival in old age was to produce progeny who would look after you. This harsh reality was especially so for women. Even when one considers the staggering rate of birth related deaths for women, it was still a worse option to grow old and barren with no family than to risk death through childbirth trying to produce one. When one looks at more traditional societies or simply ones without government safety nets to fall back on, mothers revered their sons more so than even their daughters. Sons were seen as your ticket to a peaceful old age where you would be supported and cared for. Today a son is just one less person a woman can go shopping with.
.
As such the disdain for white male’s starts early in their lives with their own mothers. In earlier times such women would have made certain to impart more masculine virtues to their sons, as these sons were their insurance policy in old age. Should a boy display cowardly, shiftless or effeminate characteristics mothers traditionally would chastise them for it, as it would not bode well for their own survival down the road.
.
Various examples of this come to mind throughout Western history. Spartan mothers use to tell their sons when embarking on a military campaign “With it or on it” as in return with your shield or being carried on it by others. During a battle in Classical Greece if men were to break ranks and run, they would have to drop their heavy shields in the process. If men stood their ground and were killed, they would be carried home on their large shields. This attitude can be seen even in white American mothers until quite recently. One such mother during the civil war upon learning of her son’s death in battle had only one question for the messenger “was he shot in the front or back?” Upon learning it was the front she replied with the words “good than he didn’t die a coward.” Your average mother nowadays is much more likely to impart the feel good philosophy of “be nice to everyone” or “treat others how you would like to be treated” than instill any protective or fierce instincts in their sons. They do this because they no longer need their sons outside having pictures to show off to their friends of picturesque little families that fit their ascending office or professional career. If a woman doesn’t  need her son to be a man who will protect her in old age, mothers are less likely to try and steer their sons in such a direction and instead treat them as a sort of pet.
.
Perhaps I am hyper aware of this trend in women as I had the good fortune of growing up next to my gritty realist grandmother, whose own child rearing philosophy was markedly devoid of feel good egalitarianism when compared with that of my own mother’s hyper moral “be nice” approach. When I was old enough to understand Grandma would often regal me with stories of suicidal kindness and the problems it will cause for you. As I grew older I learned that being nice often gives you the appearance of weakness and makes you a target of those who do not share your feel good notions of fair play. How much of the problem of weakness among western males stems from women who no longer need to raise steadfast protective sons can only be guessed at. That being said I know my own world view changed dramatically when exposed to the teachings of a woman, who had seen tough times and saw the world for what it is and not what the koombaya crowd wants it to be.
.
As always I speak of averages and quotients but again the exception proves the rule.  This rule just as my grandmother advised me when I brought home my first girlfriend in high school, is that “women don’t like nice guys.” This is perhaps an oversimplification of the mating trends in today’s society. What this statement means is an explanation of the attraction to Dark Triad personality traits. The Dark Triad encompasses narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Evolutionary psychology has come up with some interesting theories to explain attraction to the Dark Triad. However in reality I believe it may be much simpler. Women are attracted to social status as social status secures resources. Males who are secure in their status tend to display less neuroticism and self-doubt than those who are not. A lack of self-doubt often leads to an overly confident uninhibited demeanor, more commonly known as being an “asshole.” Simplified women like assholes because they can afford to be assholes. Nice guys on the other hand are often seen as weak because they appear to be seeking approval or being needy, whether they are or not. Men with social status don’t need to seek approval or apologize.
.
That being said there is a strong genetic component toward male personality traits, which is entirely irrelevant toward whether a man has the confidence boosting, inhibition lowering social status women are attracted too. Most personality traits are between 40-80% heritable with extraversion and aggression being roughly 50% heritable based on twin studies. (Segal and Tellegen) Genes don’t evolve in isolation, rather populations evolve genetics in an interrelated way. If the males of one population were selected for empathy and pair bonding, the females of this population would in turn evolve characteristics which compliment these tendencies such as high social trust and perhaps a more socially dominant nature, as their male counterparts would allow it. If males from another population selected for enmity, low pair bonding and low social trust were suddenly introduced to this once isolated population, the whole matting game would be thrown out of sync. These more aggressive, less caring males displaying more of the Dark Triad traits would be seen by the women as more dominant and thus more desirable. These preferences would be exaggerated if in the society women were not dependent on their men for resources.
.
Generally speaking empathy and pair bonding among males usually evolves in cold environments with scarce food resources. In these environment males are constrained by their ability to engage in polygamy by the high labor cost and high  mortality rate of providing this food during winter for their mates and children. Women in such climates are physically incapable of plowing frozen rocky soil or felling large game. Low pair bonding evolves in warmer climates where longer growing seasons and in some cases year round agriculture allows for more plentiful food resources and even the ability of women to provide for their own children as the soil is softer and more fertile. In a society where men could afford more than one wife or simply not have to invest as much in the one they have men would behave very differently. This is the tendency as one moves from north to south in Eurasia. The warmer it gets the less empathy and pair bonding is displayed men. This tendency may be influenced by their culture to a degree but seeing as genes create culture, there is a limiting feedback mechanism so in large groups this makes little difference. As these men are less attached and caring to women, they would be seen as more dominant and desirable by women if suddenly injected into a population without these tendencies.
.
This phenomenon can be readily seen in contemporary Europe as millions of males from warmer climes trek north under the guise as migrants and refugees, to claim mates and assert their dominance over their more empathetic, high trust and respectful hosts. Given these patterns it would be wise for the Euro and White Nationalist crowds to keep some restraint when it comes to pedestalizing the fairer sex of our tribe as they seem increasingly to hate us for it. In essence this proposal could be seen as learning from our enemies and some may have reservations against it as it is a break with the tradition of Western chivalry. However would it really be any different from the actions of our own ancestors, who themselves “culturally appropriated” various functional traditions from other civilizations and tribes? This ability in itself is uniquely Western as no other group until recently, excluding the obvious exception of the Japanese, was able or willing to adopt successfully the practices and modes of another civilization.

Anyways just weighing the options.

nice sperm