Category Archives: StorminNorman

Miscegenation an Objective View

As there is so much pseudo science and politicaly motivated information regarding miscegenation I feel the need to put an article out there to put the matter in context. In regards to the phenomena of miscegenation it must first be defined. The definition of which I will be operating on is the genetic intermingling through sexual reproduction of two populations both genetically and phenotypically distinct from each other. The classical definition of miscegenation would of course be the “interbreeding between races” but seeing as the term race always brings up accusations of “folk taxonomy” or pseudo-science I prefer to use the term continental population or sub species. A population is a group of individuals of one species inhabiting one location and interbreeding and the biological definition of a subspecies being the only valid taxonomic classification below the species level. A species in turn is a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.

.

To understand what a subspecies is it is useful to visualize the 90% rule which says “If 90% of population A differs from 90% of population B” than you have a subspecies. (Mayr, Ernst 1969) To think of it in layman’s terms if you took 100 individuals from one group and 100 from another group mixed them together and were than able to resort them into their original groups by appearance or traits than you have two distinct subspecies. (Whitman 2014) Using this 90% rule it becomes evident that miscegenation is nothing more than the interbreeding between two subspecies. Something which when applied to wolves or wild horses is abhorred by conservationists as it reduces ecological and biological diversity. As the old Green Peace saying goes “extinction is forever.” Though with modern day gene sequencing and reproductive technologies we may need to adjust this adage.

.

In regards to Homo sapiens miscegenation has been going on since the species originated and began spreading out across the globe. In prehistoric times people were far less mobile than they are now and probably didn’t wander far from the place of their birth, at least if they could help it. Traveling into unknown territory with hostile strangers and unknown food supply would have been unadvisable to say the least. Geographical barriers would have also hindered travel and led to further differentiation among the species as mountains, deserts, oceans and islands acted as filters if not total barriers to movement. After the initial colonization of the globe ending after the last Glacial Maxim and rising of sea levels, most people probably did not interact or interbreed with groups that were vastly different from themselves either in looks “phenotype” or in genetics “genotype.” Most certainly no Arctic Inuit ever encountered an Australian aborigine or interbred with one in ancient times.

.
If one population was to travel it would have meant encroaching on another population’s territory and resources which would have resulted in conflict and small scale tribal war often resulting in the genocide of one population through the killing of the males and the enslavement and or intermarriage of the females of the less powerful or less numerous population. In this regard prehistoric humans were very similar to chimps. Male chimps of one interrelated group will stake out a territory, constantly patrol it and explore slightly beyond the boundaries. When they meet males from an unrelated group they will attack them and if numerically superior and kill them. Neighboring bands of chimps will repeat this process to each other until all the males of one group are killed off. When this happens they kill the juvenile chimps and mate with the females of the defeated group. Similar to how the Greeks threw Trojan babies from the walls during their sack of Troy.
The real question is why do males of rival population seek to kill the males of another population? To answer this we must look at the world through a strictly genetic sense and inquire into the life work of evolutionary biologists Edward O Wilson and William D Hamilton.

.
Both men wished to answer the question of “altruism” among social insects such as bees and ants. Altruism is a behavior that decreases an individual’s fitness and increases the fitness of another around it. In other words why do social insects form complex social groups and sacrifice their own “fitness” or genetic survival for that of their related kin. This issue perplexed even Charles Darwin. Hamilton’s work led to the revolutionary theory of “kin selection and inclusive fitness.” Simply put Hamilton determined it was useful to think of “survival of the fittest” from the point of view of “individual genes.” Humans for example share 50% of their genes with their siblings and 12.5% with their cousins. You pass on 50% of your genes to your children, 25% to your grandchildren and 12.5% to your great grandchildren. In essence a gene that caused you to sacrifice your life to save two siblings or eight cousins would be beneficial and spread among the group as a percentage of your genes would survive even if you did not. In the case of ants who are 75% related to their siblings (through complicated genetics I won’t get into) this behavioral is even more extreme leading only one ant or bee in the colony to reproduce and the rest to support her. This same tendency to favor close genetic relatives exists in all species particularly mammals.

.
But how does this answer the question of male chimps from one population killing males of another? Simply put these chimps are not closely related and by killing other males and “inserting” their own genes into a neighboring population by reproducing with their females, they are effectively destroying the genetic fitness of the neighboring population and advancing their own. Behavior that harms another organism with no apparent benefit to one’s self Hamilton termed “spiteful behavior” but in reality it is beneficial as it destroys or hinders genes that are in competition with the perpetrator’s genes. This in a nutshell is genetic similarity theory. My genes are in competition with your genes but helping those who are genetically similar to me helps my genes survive and hurting those who are genetically dissimilar to me prevents competition from rival genes.

.
So where does this leave the offspring of males who produced offspring with dissimilar populations? Well it depends on how dissimilar, how extensive the intermingling and the paternal groups attitudes towards the offspring. In the case of humans several scenarios have emerged under different circumstances throughout history. In the case of the Mongol conquest of Eurasia war rape and bride taking of non-Mongol women was common. From a genetic testing it’s has been determined the male lines of Central Asia are heavily East Asian while the female lines are heavily Western Eurasian (European or Iranic). Likewise in the Americas the Mestizo and Mulatto populations are heavily European on the male line but Amerindian and West African on the female line, though this varies in percentage by region and social class.

.
The present day Northern Russian population demonstrates the direction in which admixed genes strive for and that is the dominance and eventual hard sweep of the subjugated group’s alleles. A hard sweep is the removal of a certain genetic allele or alleles from a population. An allele in turn is one of alternative forms of a gene that arise by mutation and is found at the same place on a chromosome. It is well known that there are genetic affinities with Asian or Mongoloid looking Siberian groups among the peoples of the northern Russian forest. However unlike these seemingly related Siberian groups the North Russians do not possess the EDAR gene which gives East Asian Mongoloid peoples there characteristic eye shape, hair texture, shovel shaped incisors and dry earwax. This seems a paradox for a people who have ancestry from a group with the EDAR gene unless one consider purifying selection or the removal of an allele or in this case multiple alleles from a population.

.
Consider the following scenario. If one population is fixed at 100% for the A allele and another population is fixed at 100% for the B allele and if only males of population A mixed with the females of population B than the first generation would be 50% fixed for A and 50% fixed for B. By random chance each succeeding generation would see the ratio of these alleles fluctuate. If there was discrimination in favor of a certain phenotype or look caused by allele A than allele B would suffer. If there was discrimination against the look caused by allele B than A would gain in percentage as people choose to mate with individuals possessing A over B. If a group like North Russians were to have a preference for European features or just an internalized hatred of East Asian features and if these pressures were strong enough, than in following generations one phenotype and in turn genotype would prevail. To put it in layman’s terms Mongoloid genes seem to have been bred out of the North Russian population. A similar pattern may have happened in Finnish peoples as they share the same genetic affinities.

.
Similar instances have occurred in India and Latin America where racial caste systems have sprung up from historical intermingling of genetically distinct populations. The Caste system in India is the result of Indo-Aryan invaders from Central Asia conquering Dravidian peoples who in turn conquered Andaman Islander “negrito” like peoples. Other groups also added to the genetic medley with the introgression of East Asian, Austro Asiatic speaking peoples from the Burmese Border and other East Asian peoples from Nepal and Mughal Conquest. However in spite of the great injection of intermingling peoples the tendency after these initial conquests seems to have been genetic segregation with people breaking into endogamous groups based on appearance and in turn genetic similarity.

.
Likewise in Latin America a more recent phenomenon is scene with mate preference for European phenotypes. This has produced an upper class which ancestrally is not entirely white genetically though in appearance is. They may express European phenotypes but when put to genetic testing there is often low lying Amerindian and West African DNA. In the case of Argentina such extreme mate preference occurred that the traditional indigenous and African population of the country is virtually nonexistent today even if you may be able to detect it at low levels in the modern day white populations DNA.

.
This tendency of genes to separate along lines of genetic similarity does not stop at mixed populations. Studies of sexually active couples and marriage partners among homogeneous populations show that when their genetics are analyzed they are more similar than the average individuals in that population. (Rushton, 1989) For most of human history the tendency outside of conquest was for people to marry somewhat distant relatives. In more traditional areas of the world like the Middles East and South Asia as many as 53% of people still marry first or second cousins as is the case with Iraq. (HBD Chick, FDB Cousin Marriage and clans and tribes in Iraq) In Pakistan the world leader in cousin marriage it reaches 70%. If all of human history was tallied it’s estimated that 80% of all marriages have been to first or second cousins. (BrighterBrains.org Cousin Marriage in Pakistan)

.
This innate often extreme desire to seek common genes is the very basis for ethnic group and sub species formation. Given enough time and isolation a group will continue to intermingle until all individuals in the population are interrelated. Most people alive today are heavily interrelated with their co-ethnics if you consider the size and scope of family trees. Going back 8 generations you have 1024 openings in your family tree, thirty generations ago it reaches a billion and forty generations ago it reaches a trillion! Of course there were not a trillion people alive in 1000 A.D. so you are descended from multiple pathways from the same ancestors. This explains why ethnic groups act altruistic towards their co ethnics more so than out group members as these individuals are in fact their distant relatives who share common genes. By helping these relatives you ensure the survival of your genes.
This endogamy among a population is also how specific traits like eye color, hair color, resistance to disease, body build, cognitive and personality traits become common or even fixed in a population as a favored trait or set of traits is spread within it. The longer two populations have been separated or the greater the selective pressure on the group the more extreme these differences will become.

.
After such divergent evolution if two populations or subspecies come into contact together and reproduce the offspring are often confronted with unforeseen consequences affecting health. In spite of the pop culture belief in “hybrid vigor” or the inheritance of the most desirable traits from both parents the offspring are just as likely to inherit the least desirable traits. Although desirable is a subjective term and can mean different things under different ecological circumstances. Here in lies the biggest hindrance to miscegenation as a desirable phenomenon. If two parents evolved to fit very different ecological niches interbreed they often pass on genes to their offspring that do not function well together. As genes do not evolve independently but rather as a package of interworking traits to ensure the survival of their carrier, combining such genetic packages often interferes with their fitness and the ability to form functioning cellular and organ systems. Is it really little wonder than that mixed race children suffer from higher rates of mental illness, allergies, autism, still births and birth defects when compared to mono racial children in the United States? (J. Richard Udry, 1995)
Even the most preferred racial pairing among high IQ types of European Man and East Asian women has been shown to result in exceptionally high rates of birth complications and health problems later in life. ( Race Bias Tracks Conception Risk Across the Menstrual Cycle, Navarrete Michigan State)

.
This purpose of this article is not to necessarily take a side on the issue of miscegenation and designate it as “good” or “bad” as most common people would. Rather I am attempting to explain the biological forces that give us instincts toward our own groups genetic preservation as well as the destruction of other groups genetic integrity via the male desire to dominate outgroup males and copulate with their novel looking females. By doing this a male is effectively destroying the other groups fitness as the progeny of such unions would not be accepted by their own group. In earlier times high childhood mortality rates and strong preferences for progeny that look like the in group would leave such individuals at a biological disadvantage. More often than not these hybrid offspring would separate along genetic similarity lines via genetic segregation and in group preference for homogeneous looking individuals. Just think how children tease and bully the child who has larger ears or a strange looking nose when compared to the rest of the group. Hybrid offspring would either not survive or have their genetic admixture mostly bred out over succeeding generations. This has been the case for much of human existence and the longer the intermixing event between two or more populations the stronger instinct among admixed populations to separate based on appearance. Caste Systems in turn evolved out of this tendency among admixed populations to seek out genetically similar mates.

 

 

Simplified this means although a male may pass on his genes with a genetically dissimilar female he increases the amount of his genes that survive into the next generation if he reproduces with a woman with those same genes. Other out group males in turn will attempt to impregnate women of his in group to decrease his fitness and in turn the fitness of his population

AI Presents: RED DAWN 2

Muffy Aldrich

RED DAWN 2: Where Did All the WASPs Go?

White Anglo-Saxon Protestants–America’s original elite. How many are left? Greg, Vince and Norman ponder the Anglo Question. How do the WASPs compare with other elite ethnic groups like the Spanish in Latin America or the Aryans in Iran? Norman, a true-blue Anglo himself, brings personal experience of WASP life in one of his breed’s last redoubts: Boston.

The AI bros also tackle the issue of normies. Can they be cured by a hard encounter with racial reality? Or are they damned to liberal zombietude?

Articles mentioned in this week’s episode:

Ron Unz on Jews in the Ivy League,

Steve Sailer’s review of Houellebecq’s Submission

Women in Iran

Edward Bernays

Some Musings On WASPs

Let’s face it WASPS are like Bigfoot a semi mythical creature said to exist by some yet whose very existence as species I have yet to confirm. However there is a creature in the fossil record Gigantopithecus that does prove the existence of a Bigfoot like creature in history overlapping the range of reported sittings of this elusive beast. Likewise WASPS did exist in American history yet in my lifetime I have never had a confirmed sighting rather only second hand reports from individuals who say they have seen WASPS. Moreover from what I can deduce through casual conversation with the huddled masses of “normie” millennials I would argue most do not even know what a WASP is or even understand what the abbreviation stands for. Case in point I was at a bar hitting on a rather in your face Italian American chick from East Boston (I know because I always ask the ethnicity of the girl I’m about to have a go at to see if I can cross off another box on my list) When she replied with “What are you.” After a short round of guessing on her part I replied “I’m a WASP.” She looked at me as if I had 2 heads and replied “What’s that” so of course I explained.
In Boston the supposed habitat of the elusive WASP the only Individuals who seem to know what a WASP is are the ones who have WASPS in their family tree or those who are highly educated beyond your basic marketing or elementary education major. As were the female Chinese American Medical Students who were somewhat enamored by the fact they had cornered the elusive WASP out of his normal habitat at a nightclub in the POZ that is Boston. The only white American girl I encountered who used the word WASP to describe herself was a twenty something recently graduated English major from the well to do town of Williams Massachusetts. She herself did not actually use WASP but “WASPY” as in “I’m not sure what I am I think my family is pretty WASPY.”
Perhaps the reason I have encountered so few WASP’s or people who even understand the term is because at least in New England they are virtually extinct or at least critically endangered for the same reason the Red Wolf is, loss of habitat and interbreeding with other geographically distinct populations. You see in New England the WASPs despite their supposed contempt for the Irish, Italians and other ethnic mostly Catholic white Europeans, were actually very inclusive towards them.

Not only did the WASPs have an open door policy about who could come to this country from Europe, the country they created through bloodshed and imagination, they allowed their most precious institution the Ivy League to remain open to all who were intelligent or studious enough to attend. It was this sense of Universalism and out group trust that lead the WASPs and their fellow North West Europeans “NWE” to create societies and proposition nations that all of Europe and eventually the rest of the world preferred to their own ethnic groups creations. Though the high social trust and Universalist tendencies of the WASP may have been their greatest strength it became their downfall. Just like the tragic epic heroes of Homeric Greece whose greatest quality becomes their undoing, the WASPs desire to see others as brothers and sisters of man as opposed to strangers led more nepotistic, low social trust groups to supplant them from their institutions. Eventually these outsiders married into their very families and through overwhelming numbers and the traditional Catholic penchant for reproduction overwhelmed the WASP and lead to his extinction, at least in the pure form.

The decline of the WASP began during the time of the Irish Potato famine and it accelerated in the turn of the 1900s immigration wave to the USA from Southern and Eastern Europe. The WASPs were dealt their death blow in the post WW2 suburbs that sprung up in the 1950s economic boom where WASPs, Irish, Italians, Poles, Swedes, Greeks, Portuguese, French Canadians, Germans, Lithuanians, Jews and many more all intermingled and intermarried.

I myself am the closest thing to an actual WASP I have yet to really encounter and at that my paternal grandmother and maternal great grandmother married into WASP families themselves from non-Anglo Saxon heritage. So in that respect even this elusive WASP cannot be said to truly exist. But If one wishes to find further proof of the decline of the WASP hierarchy in New England and particularly Boston outside the obvious demographic data of Harvard, I point no further than the governors of the Bay Colony and Mayors of Boston going back to before the Kennedy administration, not a WASP in site.

So the next time you meet a SWPL who is signaling about how moral they are or gets offended easy, I advise you to ask them their ancestry my suspicion is that they are not a Cabot or a Lodge but perhaps an O’Connell or perhaps even Gold.

Merry Christmas ….or Whats Left of It

Merry Christmas!…. or whatever it is we are exactly celebrating these days. I have been advised by recent talking heads on TV, radio and social media that “It is our Christian obligation to take in the Syrian refugees.” and that we have “nothing to celebrate so longs as others suffer.” Well that’s fine and all but as a secular agnostic I take offense at others projecting their religious values upon me and mine this holiday season.

Whatever “white guilt” they feel could be quickly cleansed by a trip to a Syria where they themselves could then administer to the needs of these said refugees or better yet these news anchors could take them into their own palatial McMansions and sponsor them sending teenage Ahkmed to school with their daughters. I suffer no such guilt over the suffering of other people caused by their own co ethnics. I do however feel guilt over non co ethnics causing suffering to my co ethnics because of “do gooder” causes which bring in the refuse of the world to occupy my soil and to live among my nation.

I mean I could understand the Christians if they were actually bringing in actual Syrian Christian refugees. But seeing as the current powers that be seek to bring in over 100,000 Muslims and settle them primarily in areas not among fellow Arabs like in Dearborn Michigan but rather in lily white areas like Montana I am perplexed. If the crisis in Europe is anything to gage these refugees by I will use my powers of deduction and guess they are not refugees but rather economic opportunists at best and hostile occupiers sympathetic to ISIS at worst. With 79% of these refugees being men of fighting age (late teens to late twenties) I highly doubt they are just women and children feeling a war zone. At that depending which organizations estimate you believe 30-90% of these said refugees are not actual Syrians and a miniscule number of those are Syrian Christians with most actual Syrians being Muslims and most of the refugees being from other countries like Pakistan or Iraq. But I digress give todays crop of social media savvy whites a chance to “moral signal” to others just how moral, giving and better than the masses of proles they are and they will. So Instead of trying to rationalize with them or even use emotional outcries about the safety of their own children, that is assuming any of these selfish moral crusading types had children, I will instead put things in perspective.

If the roles were reversed would Arab Muslims take in multitudes of Christian and atheists? Seeing as the rich Gulf Arab states are not taking in their fellow Arab Muslims I think not.

I’m dreaming of a white guilt free Christmas. Sadly I think my stocking will be filled with coal burners.

Merry Christmas